Bioethics authorship in context: how trends in biomedicine challenge bioethics.
Bioethics authorship in context: how trends in biomedicine challenge bioethics.
复制标题
背景下的生物伦理学作者身份：生物医学趋势如何挑战生物伦理学。
DOI：
10.1080/15265161.2011.603808
复制
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Ankeny RA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ankeny RA
Resnik 和 Master (2011) 为他们所说的生物伦理学“概念性”论文提出了一套作者指南。鉴于存在有关生物伦理学实证研究的各种指南，这些指南专门解决了在多作者概念研究出版物中谁应该算作作者的问题。他们的论点涉及一个重要且有争议的问题，但他们没有考虑到围绕多作者研究出版物增长的更广泛的历史和社会背景。在本文中，我们概述了该背景的一些特征，特别是“大科学”的兴起及其对生物医学和生物伦理学实践模式（包括作者标准）的影响。然后，我们指出考虑到这种背景会导致对雷斯尼克和马斯特的一些结论提出挑战的方式，并勾勒出可以克服这些困难的替代模型。
Resnik and Master (2011) propose a set of authorship guidelines for what they describe as “conceptual” papers in bioethics. These guidelines specifically address who should count as an author within multiply-authored conceptual research publications, given that various guidelines exist regarding empirical research in bioethics. Their arguments attend to an important and controversial issue, yet they do not take account of the broader historical and social contexts surrounding the growth of multiply-authored research publications. In this paper, we outline some of the characteristics of that context, particularly the rise of “big science” and its effects on patterns of practice (including authorship criteria) in the biomedical sciences and in turn bioethics. We then point to ways in which taking account of this context leads to challenges to some of Resnik and Master’s conclusions, and sketch alternative models that could overcome those difficulties.