Adsorption of molybdate and tetrathiomolybdate onto pyrite and goethite: effect of pH and competitive anions.

Adsorption of molybdate and tetrathiomolybdate onto pyrite and goethite: effect of pH and competitive anions.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.06.025
复制
发表时间:
2006-03
期刊:
影响因子:
8.8
通讯作者:
N. Xu;C. Christodoulatos;W. Braida
N. Xu;C. Christodoulatos;W. Braida
中科院分区:
环境科学与生态学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
N. Xu;C. Christodoulatos;W. Braida

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

两种主要的钼(Mo)物质,钼酸盐(MoO42-)和四硫代钼酸盐(MoS42-)在两种主要铁矿物黄铁矿(FeS2)和针铁矿(FeOOH)上的吸附旨在阐明缺氧沉积物中钼固定的可能机制。将 MoS42-(或 MoO42-)和针铁矿(或黄铁矿)在 0.1M NaCl 溶液中的悬浮液在缺氧条件下、25°C、pH 范围为 3 至 10 进行平衡。还讨论了硫酸盐、磷酸盐和硅酸盐对黄铁矿和针铁矿吸附 MoO42-和 MoS42-的竞争效应。 MoO42-和MoS42-在黄铁矿和针铁矿上的吸附通常可以通过Langmuir模型在低pH值下得到很好的描述;吸附程度是 pH 值和表面负载的函数。在低表面负载的酸性 pH 范围 (pH<5) 中观察到最大吸附。钼的吸附 (μmolg−1) 取决于 Mo 的种类和铁矿物的类型,顺序为:MoS42-–针铁矿>MoO42-–针铁矿>MoS42-–黄铁矿>MoO42-–黄铁矿。磷酸盐似乎与 MoO42- 和 MoS42- 强烈竞争黄铁矿和针铁矿的吸附位点。磷酸盐竞争效应的强度遵循MoO42--针铁矿~MoO42--黄铁矿>MoS42--黄铁矿>MoS42--针铁矿的顺序。硅酸盐和硫酸盐对MoO42-和MoS42-的吸附影响可以忽略不计。 MoS42- 铁矿物的优先吸附及其在竞争性阴离子存在下的行为表明,四硫代钼酸盐物质可能是最终的储库,并且可能控制沉积物中的钼富集。
The adsorption of two major molybdenum (Mo) species, molybdate (MoO42-) and tetrathiomolybdate (MoS42-) onto two main iron minerals pyrite (FeS2) and goethite (FeOOH) is addressed to elucidate the possible mechanisms of molybdenum immobilization in anoxic sediments. Suspensions of MoS42-(or MoO42-) and goethite (or pyrite) in 0.1M NaCl solution were equilibrated under anoxic conditions at 25°C in the pH range from 3 to 10. The competitive effects of sulfate, phosphate, and silicate on the adsorption of MoO42-and MoS42-by pyrite and goethite are also addressed. Adsorption of MoO42-and MoS42-on pyrite and goethite is in general well described by a Langmuir model at low pH; the extent of sorption is a function of pH and the surface loading. Maximum sorption is observed in the acidic pH range (pH<5) at low surface loading. The adsorption of molybdenum (μmolg−1) depends upon Mo species and on the type of iron mineral following the order: MoS42-–goethite>MoO42-–goethite>MoS42-–pyrite>MoO42-–pyrite. Phosphate appears to compete strongly with MoO42-and MoS42-for the sorption sites of pyrite and goethite. The strength of the phosphate competitive effect follows the sequence of MoO42-–goethite∼MoO42-–pyrite>MoS42-–pyrite>MoS42-–goethite. Silicate and sulfate have a negligible effect on the sorption of MoO42-and MoS42-. The preferred adsorption by iron mineral of MoS42-, as well as its behavior in the presence of competitive anions suggests that tetrathiomolybdate species may be an ultimate reservoir and may control Mo enrichment in the sediments.