Time Travels
Time Travels
复制标题
DOI：
10.1215/9780822386551
复制
发表时间：
2020-11
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
E. Grosz
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
E. Grosz
虽然时间概念是女权主义理论、法律和正义、自然科学以及政治斗争思想的许多核心项目的基础，但时间性很少是它们的直接分析对象。伊丽莎白·格罗兹（Elizabeth Grosz）在本书中汇集的文章中，将时间和持续时间的问题放在首位，以探索重新思考时间性如何改变和振兴关键的学术和政治项目。这些文章涉及的主题从女性性行为到权力概念到文化研究的理解，揭示了Grosz对发明政治的倡导，一种无法提前规划的政治-一种更多地投资于过程而不是结果的政治。格罗兹的反思如何反思时间可能会产生对自然，文化，主体性和政治的新理解是广泛的。她从一个令人信服的论点，即查尔斯达尔文的生物和文化进化的概念可能有利于女权主义者，酷儿和反种族主义议程的探索现代法学的依赖感，未来总是遥不可及。她根据德勒兹、梅洛-庞蒂和詹姆斯的著作来研究柏格森的持续时间哲学，并讨论了与尼采、福柯、德勒兹和吕斯伊里格瑞思想有关的性别差异、身份、快乐和欲望等问题。总之，这些文章展示了Grosz关于时间的思考的广泛范围和适用性，作为一种理论化不足但独特的生产力。
While concepts of time underlie many of the central projects of feminist theory, law and justice, and the natural sciences as well as ideas about political struggle, temporality is rarely their direct object of analysis. In her essays brought together in this volume, Elizabeth Grosz moves questions about time and duration to the fore in order to explore how rethinking temporality might transform and revitalize key scholarly and political projects. Dealing with time in relation to topics ranging from female sexuality to conceptions of power to understandings of cultural studies, these essays reveal Grosz's advocacy of a politics of invention, a politics that cannot be mapped out in advance--one that is more invested in processes than in results. Grosz's reflections on how rethinking time might generate new understandings of nature, culture, subjectivity, and politics are wide-ranging. She moves from a compelling argument that Charles Darwin's notion of biological and cultural evolution can potentially benefit feminist, queer, and antiracist agendas to an exploration of modern jurisprudence's reliance on the sense that the future is always beyond reach. She examines Henri Bergson's philosophy of duration in light of the writings of Gilles Deleuze, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, and William James, and she discusses issues of sexual difference, identity, pleasure, and desire in relation to the thought of Friedrich Nietzsche, Michel Foucault, Deleuze, and Luce Irigaray. Together, these essays demonstrate the broad scope and applicability of Grosz's thinking about time as an under-theorized but uniquely productive force.