Environmental justice? The story of two projects
Environmental justice? The story of two projects
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.12.011
复制
发表时间：
2014-07
期刊：
影响因子：
3.5
通讯作者：
P. Blaikie;J. Muldavin
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Blaikie;J. Muldavin
本文探讨了位于喜马拉雅东部和印度东部的两个项目在环境保护政策和实践中的一些主要正义问题。第一个是在印度的梅加拉亚邦，第二个是越过边境的云南省中国。这两个项目都是由国际捐助者设计和资助、与各国政府谈判并与当地机构合作实施的。他们以类似的方式处理四个相关的环境保护问题-森林管理、坡地种植、流域管理和轮作耕作。然而，这两个项目在环境正义方面的结果截然不同。外部捐助者司法框架和国家政府(及其下级行政当局)之间的翻译政治是解释其中原因的关键。
This paper explores some major issues of justice in environmental conservation policy and practice in two projects situated in the eastern Himalayas and eastern India. The first is in the state of Meghalaya, India and the second across the frontier in China in Yunnan Province. Both projects were designed and financed by international donors, negotiated with the national governments and implemented in cooperation with local institutions. They deal with four related environmental conservation issues in similar ways – forest management, the cultivation of sloping lands, watershed management and shifting cultivation. However, the outcomes of these two projects in terms of environmental justice were profoundly different. The politics of translation between external donor framings of justice and national governments (and their lower level administrations) are key to explaining why.