A Systematic Review of Retractions in the Field of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia.
A Systematic Review of Retractions in the Field of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1053/j.jvca.2021.09.005
复制
发表时间：
2022-03
影响因子：
2.8
通讯作者：
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
目前还没有关于心胸外科和血管麻醉中牵开的系统研究。本分析的目的是确定过去三十年来该领域撤回的特征和趋势。检索了Retraction Watch数据库中1990年至2020年间发表的心胸和血管麻醉领域的撤回文章。文献计量学研究选择了5，344篇主题代码中包含术语“医学”的撤回文章。纳入了报告心胸和血管麻醉结果的英文全文文章的撤回。无1990年1月至2020年8月期间发表在31种期刊上的63篇文章被撤回。大多数是原创文章（n=60，95.2%），因科学不端行为而撤回（n=50，79.4%）。由于不当行为而撤回的百分比从2010年开始增加，2011年达到峰值（n=26/50，52.0%），并在2014年达到稳定水平。撤回的三个最常见原因是作者不当行为（n=31，49.2%），重复（n=12，19.0%）和手稿中的错误（n=11，17.5%）。从发表到撤回的中位时间为4.3年（IQR：1.7-9.4），并随着时间的推移显著下降（P<0.001）。发表撤回论文的期刊的中位影响因子为3.5（IQR 2.0-4.5），在研究期间显著下降（P<0.001）。科学不端行为是心胸和血管麻醉中撤回的最常见原因。撤稿时间中位数和期刊影响因子随时间显著下降。虽然这是有希望的，但未来应努力筛查伪造数据，并在撤回后将流程标准化，以突出有问题的手稿。
No systematic studies on retractions in cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia exist. The aim of this analysis is to identify characteristics and trends of retractions in this field over the past three decades. A search of the Retraction Watch database for retracted articles published between 1990 and 2020 in the field of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia was performed. Bibliometric Study 5,344 retractions with the term “medicine” in the subject code were selected. Retractions of full-length English articles reporting finding in cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia were included. None A total of 63 articles published in 31 journals from January 1990 to August 2020 were retracted. The majority were original articles (n=60, 95.2%) and retracted for scientific misconduct (n=50, 79.4%). The percentage of retractions due to misconduct increased from 2010, with a spike in 2011 (n=26/50, 52.0%), and reached a plateau in 2014. The three most common reasons for retraction were misconduct by author (n=31, 49.2%), duplication (n=12, 19.0%), and errors within the manuscript (n=11, 17.5%). The median time from publication to retraction was 4.3 years (IQR:1.7–9.4) and decreased significantly over time (P<0.001). The median impact factor of the journals that published retracted articles was 3.5 (IQR 2.0–4.5) and decreased significantly over the study period (P<0.001). Scientific misconduct represents the most common reason for retraction in cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia. The median time to retraction and journal impact factor decreased significantly over time. While this is promising, future efforts should be made to screen for falsified data and standardize the processes after retraction to highlight problematic manuscripts.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1007/s12630-019-01508-3
发表时间：
2019-10-15
影响因子：
4.2
作者：
Nair, Singh;Yean, Chetra;Adams, David C.
通讯作者：
Adams, David C.
影响因子：
10.7
作者：
McHugh, U. M.;Yentis, S. M.
通讯作者：
Yentis, S. M.
DOI：
10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100201
发表时间：
2020-11-01
影响因子：
6.3
作者：
Bennett, Carrie;Chambers, Laura M.;Berghella, Vincenzo
通讯作者：
Berghella, Vincenzo
影响因子：
4.1
作者：
Wager, Elizabeth;Williams, Peter
通讯作者：
Williams, Peter
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
Moylan, Elizabeth C.;Kowalczuk, Maria K.
通讯作者：
Kowalczuk, Maria K.