The times we’re in: Queer feminist criticism and the reparative ‘turn’
The times we’re in: Queer feminist criticism and the reparative ‘turn’
复制标题
我们所处的时代：酷儿女权主义批评和修复性“转向”
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Robyn Wiegman
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Robyn Wiegman
本文通过追踪当代酷儿女性主义研究中情感和时间的双重兴趣，来审视酷儿女性主义研究的修复性转向。通过突出伊芙·科索夫斯基·塞奇威克对她所谓的偏执阅读的有影响力的批评，我对各种批评家--尤其是安·茨维特科维奇、石楠·洛夫和伊丽莎白·弗里曼--通过使用日常、落后的感觉和奇怪的时间的时间框架来达到修复性目的，从而接受修复性阅读的呼吁的方式感兴趣。在这个过程中，我认为正在做的修复性工作，以收回塞奇威克作为一个主要的思想家酷儿女权主义的关注，并推测的吸引力，在一个时间的经济和文化支持的解释性人文科学的下降，一个关键的做法，寻求爱和培育其研究对象。
This article examines the reparative turn in current queer feminist scholarship by tracking its twin interest in the study of affect and time. By foregrounding Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick’s influential critique of what she called paranoid reading, I am interested in the ways that various critics – Ann Cvetkovich, Heather Love, and Elizabeth Freeman in particular – take up the call for reparative reading by using the temporal frameworks of the everyday, backward feeling, and queer time to reparative ends. In the process, I consider the reparative work being done to reclaim Sedgwick as a major thinker for queer feminist concerns, and speculate on the attraction, in a time of declining economic and cultural support for the interpretative humanities, of a critical practice that seeks to love and nurture its objects of study.