Multiple phases of the Neoproterozoic igneous activity in Quruqtagh of the northeastern Tarim Block, NW China: Interaction between plate subduction and mantle plume?
Multiple phases of the Neoproterozoic igneous activity in Quruqtagh of the northeastern Tarim Block, NW China: Interaction between plate subduction and mantle plume?
复制标题
塔里木地块东北部库鲁克塔格新元古代火成岩活动的多期:板块俯冲与地幔柱的相互作用?
DOI:
10.1016/j.precamres.2011.08.005
复制
发表时间:
2012-12
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
Ye, Hai-Min
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Zou, Hai-Bo;Wang, Hong-Yan;Li, Huai-Kun;Ye, Hai-Min
Neoproterozoic igneous rocks are widely distributed in the Quruqtagh along the northern margin of the Tarim, NW China. Here we report ages, petrography, and geochemistry of two (No. I and No. IV) Neoproterozoic bimodal intrusive complexes and Zhongtuzhan ultramafic dykes in the Quruqtagh, in order to construct a new model of Neoproterozoic tectonic evolution of the Tarim during the breakup of Rodinia. The No. I (∼20km2) and No. IV (∼10km2) bimodal intrusive complexes in Quruqtagh are composed of gabbroic and granitic rocks. New U–Pb ages of the zircons from the two intrusive complexes demonstrate that they were coevally emplaced at ca. 735Ma. The Zhongtuzhan ultramafic dykes were emplaced at ca. 802Ma, broadly coeval with the nearby Qieganbulake ultamafic-mafic–carbonatite complex. The gabbroic rocks from both No. I and No. IV complexes exhibit tholeiitic characters, enrichment in LILE and LREE, and depletion in HFSE and HREE. Isotopically, they are characterized by wide range of whole-rock ɛNd(t) values (0 to −0) and variable high (87Sr/86Sr)i(0.7095–0.7059). Zircons from the gabbroic samples of the No. I and No. IV complexes have slightly different ɛHf(t) (−1.5–0.9 and −2.5 to −0.5, respectively), indicating Nd–Hf isotopic decoupling. Zircons from Zhongtuzhan ultramafic dykes have pronounced negative ɛHf(t) (−14.9 to −11.9), resembling the Hf isotopic compositions of the baddeleyites from the Qieganbulake carbonatite. These features, combined with the presence of the primary phlogopite and hornblende, suggest that the gabbroic rocks were likely formed via combined crustal assimilation and crystal fractionation/cumulation (AFC effects) of a tholeiitic magma originally derived from a metasomatized subcontinental lithosphere mantle (SCLM). In comparison, the granites mingled into the No. I complex display adakitic signatures and pronounced negative ɛNd(t) values (≤−12), and were derived from partial melting of mafic lower crust due to the underplating of the coeval mafic magma. Our results, in conjunction with previous data in literature, indicate that the Neoproterozoic igneous activities in Quruqtagh could be broadly divided into four phases. They are as follows: (1) the ca. 820–800Ma ultramafic–mafic–carbonatite complex and voluminous adakitic granites and mafic dyke swarm; (2) the ca. 780–760Ma tholeiitic ultramafic–mafic complex and voluminous mafic dyke swarm; (3) the ca. 740–735Ma bimodal complex and bimodal volcanic series; and (4) minor 650–635Ma mafic dykes. The Neoproterozoic igneous activities waned since 740Ma as a result of the dispersing of Tarim from Rodinia. The presence of voluminous mafic rocks of arc-signature and the calc-alkaline granites in this area is due to the interaction between the Rodinian plume and oceanic crust subduction under the Tarim continent before 760Ma. As the Tarim Block was at the periphery of the Rodinia, subduction along the northern margin of the Tarim could last from late Mesoproterozoic to mid-Neoproterozoic (ca. 760Ma). During the subduction, the Rodinian plume (pulses of 825–800 and 780–740Ma) could heat the lithospheric mantle under the continental arc along the northern margin of Tarim, leading to the formation of the voluminous and diverse igneous rocks of arc-signatures. The subduction ceased at ca. 760Ma. The ca. 735Ma bimodal intrusive complex and the coeval Beiyixi basalt unconformably overlying on the ca. 820–800Ma granites, might indicate the dispersing of the Tarim from Australia.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.1
作者:
H. Holland;K. Turekian
通讯作者:
H. Holland;K. Turekian
影响因子:
3.5
作者:
D. Vielzeuf;J. Holloway
通讯作者:
D. Vielzeuf;J. Holloway
影响因子:
2.6
作者:
Chuan-Lin Zhang;Zheng‐Xiang Li;Xian‐Hua Li;Haimin Ye;Aiguo Wang;K. Guo
通讯作者:
Chuan-Lin Zhang;Zheng‐Xiang Li;Xian‐Hua Li;Haimin Ye;Aiguo Wang;K. Guo
影响因子:
3.8
作者:
Robert P. Rapp;E.Bruce Watson;Calvin F. Miller
通讯作者:
Robert P. Rapp;E.Bruce Watson;Calvin F. Miller
影响因子:
3.5
作者:
Li, Xian-Hua;Liu, Yu;Chamberlain, Kevin R.
通讯作者:
Chamberlain, Kevin R.