EFFECTS OF STATIC AND DYNAMIC STRETCHING ON SPRINT AND JUMP PERFORMANCE IN BOYS AND GIRLS
EFFECTS OF STATIC AND DYNAMIC STRETCHING ON SPRINT AND JUMP PERFORMANCE IN BOYS AND GIRLS
复制标题
DOI：
10.1519/jsc.0b013e318295d2fb
复制
发表时间：
2014-01-01
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
Smirniotou, Athanasia S.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Paradisis, Giorgos P.;Pappas, Panagiotis T.;Smirniotou, Athanasia S.
Paradisis， GP, Pappas， PT, Theodorou， AS, Zacharogiannis， EG, Skordilis， EK和Smirniotou， AS。静态和动态拉伸对男孩和女孩短跑和跳跃成绩的影响。本研究的目的是探讨静态拉伸（SS）和动态拉伸（DS）对青春期男孩和女孩爆发力、柔韧性和短跑能力的急性影响，并报告可能的性别相互作用。47名活跃的青春期男孩和女孩在接受40秒的SS和DS训练后随机接受测试，这些训练包括股四头肌、腘绳肌、髋伸肌和足底屈肌；在控制条件下不进行拉伸。前、后处理试验考察了拉伸运动对20米短跑（20米）、反动作跳跃（CMJ）高度和坐伸柔韧性测试的影响。在成绩方面，SS对男生和女生20 m和CMJ的影响分别为2.5%和6.3%。动态拉伸对男孩和女孩的20米没有影响，但对CMJ的影响为2.2%。在灵活性方面，SS和DS都提高了性能，其中SS（12.1%）比DS（6.5%）更有利。没有发现性别相互作用。因此，我们可以得出结论，SS显著负向青春期男女运动员的短跑成绩和爆发力，而DS则使爆发力恶化，对短跑成绩没有影响。这种影响的多样性表明，在青春期男孩和女孩中使用的拉伸模式应该是特定任务的。
Paradisis, GP, Pappas, PT, Theodorou, AS, Zacharogiannis, EG, Skordilis, EK, and Smirniotou, AS. Effects of static and dynamic stretching on sprint and jump performance in boys and girls. J Strength Cond Res 28(1): 154-160, 2014The aim of this study was to investigate the acute effects of static (SS) and dynamic stretching (DS) on explosive power, flexibility, and sprinting ability of adolescent boys and girls and to report possible gender interactions. Forty-seven active adolescent boys and girls were randomly tested after SS and DS of 40 seconds on quadriceps, hamstrings, hip extensors, and plantar flexors; no stretching was performed at the control condition. Pretreatment and posttreatment tests examined the effects of stretching on 20-m sprint run (20 m), countermovement jump (CMJ) height, and sit and reach flexibility test. In terms of performance, SS hindered 20 m and CMJ in boys and girls by 2.5 and 6.3%, respectively. Dynamic stretching had no effect on 20 m in boys and girls but impaired CMJ by 2.2%. In terms of flexibility, both SS and DS improved performance with SS being more beneficial (12.1%) compared with DS (6.5%). No gender interaction was found. It can therefore be concluded that SS significantly negates sprinting performance and explosive power in adolescent boys and girls, whereas DS deteriorates explosive power and has no effect on sprinting performance. This diversity of effects denotes that the mode of stretching used in adolescent boys and girls should be task specific.