First language activation during second language lexical processing - An investigation of lexical form, meaning, and grammatical class
First language activation during second language lexical processing - An investigation of lexical form, meaning, and grammatical class
复制标题
DOI：
10.1017/s0272263106060177
复制
发表时间：
2006-09-01
影响因子：
4.1
通讯作者：
Kroll, Judith F.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Sunderman, Gretchen;Kroll, Judith F.
本研究将双语交互激活模型(Dijkstra&Van Heuven，1998)和修订后的层次激活模型(Kroll&Stewart，1994)的预测放在相同的语境中，以考察二语词汇加工。两组母语为英语的人，一组不太熟练，另一组更精通西班牙语，在翻译识别方面的表现进行了比较。在这项任务中，参与者决定两个单词，两种语言各一个，是否等同于翻译。关键条件中的项目并不等同于翻译，因此需要“不”的答复，但在形式或意义上都与正确的译文相似。例如，对于翻译等价物，如Cara-Face，关键干扰因素包括(A)与该对中第一个单词的形式相关的邻居(例如，Cara-Card)，(B)与该对中的第二个单词的形式相关的邻居，即翻译等效物(Cara-Fact)，或(C)与意义相关的单词(Cara-head)。结果表明，所有学习者，无论熟练程度如何，都经历了对词汇邻居和意义相关对的干扰。然而，只有不太熟练的学习者才能通过等值翻译表现出与形式相关的效果。此外，所有被试对语法课的线索都很敏感，当每对词中的两个词来自不同的语法课时，词汇干扰就会减少或消除。我们考虑了这些结果对二语词汇加工和双语词汇模型的启示。
This study places the predictions of the bilingual interactive activation model (Dijkstra & Van Heuven, 1998) and the revised hierarchical model (Kroll & Stewart, 1994) in the same context to investigate lexical processing in a second language (L2). The performances of two groups of native English speakers, one less proficient and the other more proficient in Spanish, were compared on translation recognition. In this task, participants decided whether two words, one in each language, are translation equivalents. The items in the critical conditions were not translation equivalents and therefore required a "no" response, but were similar to the correct translation in either form or meaning. For example, for translation equivalents such as cara-face, critical distracters included (a) a form-related neighbor to the first word of the pair (e.g., cara-card), (b) a form-related neighbor to the second word of the pair, the translation equivalent (cara-fact), or (c) a meaning-related word (cara-head). The results showed that all learners, regardless of proficiency, experienced interference for lexical neighbors and for meaning-related pairs. However, only the less proficient learners also showed effects of form relatedness via the translation equivalent. Moreover, all participants were sensitive to cues to grammatical class, such that lexical interference was reduced or eliminated when the two words of each pair were drawn from different grammatical classes. We consider the implications of these results for L2 lexical processing and for models of the bilingual lexicon.