A path modeling approach to understanding family conflict: reciprocal patterns of parent coercion and adolescent avoidance.

A path modeling approach to understanding family conflict: reciprocal patterns of parent coercion and adolescent avoidance.
复制标题

理解家庭冲突的路径建模方法:父母强迫和青少年回避的相互模式。

DOI:
10.1037/a0036817
复制
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43)
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Margolin,Gayla
Margolin,Gayla
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Saxbe,DarbyE;Ramos,MichelleR;Timmons,AdeleC;Rodriguez,AubreyR;Margolin,Gayla

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

父母与青少年之间的冲突涉及到家庭成员相互影响和塑造对方行为的相互交换。本研究使用多层次路径分析来检验103个家庭三合会在15分钟的冲突讨论中观察到的行为之间的相互关系,特别关注父母的强制行为和青少年的回避行为。我们也探讨了父母过去的攻击性家庭冲突行为对父母对青少年行为反应的调节作用。讨论以3分钟的片段进行编码。分析使用了时间滞后代码,这样一个家庭成员在一个片段中的行为就可以预测下一个片段中另一个家庭成员的行为。完全饱和的交叉滞后模型测试了所有可能的路径(父母的行为预测父母和青少年的后续行为,反之亦然)。在控制青少年先前回避行为的情况下,父母的强迫行为与青少年的回避行为有显著的相关性。相反方向的影响也出现了:在前一段中,当年轻人更回避时,母亲变得更强制。父亲的强制行为与青少年的先前行为无关,当父母双方都处于同一模式时,父亲和青少年的行为不再相关;然而,父亲的强迫行为在接下来的片段中预测了更多的母亲的强迫行为。在两波数据收集中,在家庭冲突中表现得更具攻击性的母亲在青少年回避性更强时变得更具强制性,尽管父母的攻击性家庭冲突行为历史并没有调节父亲到青少年或青少年到父母的路径。(PsycINFO数据库记录(c) 2016 APA,版权所有)
Conflict between parents and adolescents involves reciprocal exchanges in which family members influence and shape each other’s behavior. This study uses multilevel path analysis to examine interrelations in observed behavior during 15-min conflict discussions conducted by 103 family triads, looking specifically at parent coercive and youth avoidant behaviors. We also explore the moderating roles of parents’ past aggressive family conflict behavior on parents’ responses to youth behavior. Discussions were coded in 3-min segments. Analyses used time-lagged codes so that a family member’s behavior in 1 segment predicted another family member’s behavior in the following segment. The fully saturated cross-lagged model tested all possible paths (parents’ behavior predicting parents’ and youths’ subsequent behavior, and vice versa). Parents’ coercive behavior was associated with more avoidant youth behavior in the following segment when controlling for youths’ prior avoidant behavior. The opposite direction of effects also emerged: Mothers became more coercive when youth were more avoidant in a prior segment. Fathers’ coercive behavior was not associated with youths’ prior behavior and, with both parents in the same model, father and youth behavior were no longer associated; however, fathers’ coercive behavior predicted more mother coercive behavior in the following segment. Mothers who had behaved more aggressively during family conflict over 2 waves of data collection became more coercive when youths were more avoidant, although parents’ history of aggressive family conflict behavior did not moderate father-to-youth or youth-to-parent paths.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)