Evaluating the Use of ChatGPT to Accurately Simplify Patient-centered Information about Breast Cancer Prevention and Screening.
Evaluating the Use of ChatGPT to Accurately Simplify Patient-centered Information about Breast Cancer Prevention and Screening.
复制标题
评估 ChatGPT 的使用，以准确简化有关乳腺癌预防和筛查的以患者为中心的信息。
DOI：
10.1148/rycan.230086
复制
发表时间：
2024
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Yi,PaulH
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Haver,HanaL;Gupta,AnujK;Ambinder,EmilyB;Bahl,Manisha;Oluyemi,EniolaT;Jeudy,Jean;Yi,PaulH
目的评估 ChatGPT 作为简化乳腺癌预防和筛查常见问题答案的工具的使用情况。材料和方法在这项回顾性探索性研究中，ChatGPT 被要求将 25 个有关乳腺癌问题的回答简化至 2023 年 3 月和 8 月的六年级阅读水平。对简化回答的临床适当性进行了评估。所有原始和简化的答案均经过 Flesch 阅读轻松指数的阅读难易度评估，以及五个量表的可读性评估：Flesch-Kincaid 等级水平、Gunning Fog 指数、Coleman-Liau 指数、自动可读性指数和 Gobbledygook（即 SMOG）指数的简单测量。使用配对测试对原始答案和简化答案之间的平均阅读难度、可读性和字数进行了比较。 McNemar 测试用于比较具有足够阅读难度（得分为 60 或更高）和可读性（六年级水平）的回答比例。结果ChatGPT 提高了平均阅读难度（原始回答，46 与简化回答，70；P< .001）和可读性（原始回答，13 年级与简化回答，8.9；P< .001），并减少了字数（原始回答，193 与简化回答，8.9；P< .001）。简化，173；P< .001）。百分之九十二（25 人中的 23 人）的简化反应被认为在临床上是合适的。所有 25 个 (100%) 简化回复均符合足够阅读便利性的标准，而 25 个原始回复中只有两个 (P< .001)。 25 条简化回复中的 2 条 (8%) 符合足够可读性的标准。ConclusionChatGPT 通过将可读性提高了四个等级，简化了常见乳腺癌筛查和预防问题的答案，但使用此工具时可能会产生不正确的信息，因此需要医生监督。关键词：乳房 X 线摄影、筛查、信息学、乳腺、教育、卫生政策和实践、肿瘤学、技术评估另请参阅 Tu 和 Joe 的评论。© RSNA，2023
PurposeTo evaluate the use of ChatGPT as a tool to simplify answers to common questions about breast cancer prevention and screening.Materials and MethodsIn this retrospective, exploratory study, ChatGPT was requested to simplify responses to 25 questions about breast cancer to a sixth-grade reading level in March and August 2023. Simplified responses were evaluated for clinical appropriateness. All original and simplified responses were assessed for reading ease on the Flesch Reading Ease Index and for readability on five scales: Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Gunning Fog Index, Coleman-Liau Index, Automated Readability Index, and the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (ie, SMOG) Index. Mean reading ease, readability, and word count were compared between original and simplified responses using pairedttests. McNemar test was used to compare the proportion of responses with adequate reading ease (score of 60 or greater) and readability (sixth-grade level).ResultsChatGPT improved mean reading ease (original responses, 46 vs simplified responses, 70;P< .001) and readability (original, grade 13 vs simplified, grade 8.9;P< .001) and decreased word count (original, 193 vs simplified, 173;P< .001). Ninety-two percent (23 of 25) of simplified responses were considered clinically appropriate. All 25 (100%) simplified responses met criteria for adequate reading ease, compared with only two of 25 original responses (P< .001). Two of the 25 simplified responses (8%) met criteria for adequate readability.ConclusionChatGPT simplified answers to common breast cancer screening and prevention questions by improving the readability by four grade levels, though the potential to produce incorrect information necessitates physician oversight when using this tool.Keywords:Mammography, Screening, Informatics, Breast, Education, Health Policy and Practice, Oncology, Technology AssessmentSee also commentary by Tu and Joe.© RSNA, 2023
新视野：OpenAI 的 ChatGPT 在临床放射学中的潜在作用。
影响因子：
4.5
作者：
A. Ismail;Nima S. Ghorashi;R. Javan
通讯作者：
R. Javan
改进的筛查乳腺 X 光检查召回信可读性对患者随访的影响
影响因子：
4.5
作者：
Derek L. Nguyen;S. Harvey;E. Oluyemi;K. Myers;Lisa A. Mullen;Emily B. Ambinder
通讯作者：
Emily B. Ambinder
来自 RadiologyInfo.org 的西班牙语患者教育材料的可读性。
影响因子：
4.5
作者：
Sherwin Novin;E. Huh;M. Bange;Ferdinand K. Hui;P. Yi
通讯作者：
P. Yi