Lack of correlation between different measurements of proprioception in the knee
Lack of correlation between different measurements of proprioception in the knee
复制标题
DOI：
10.1302/0301-620x.84b4.11241
复制
发表时间：
2002-05-01
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Yata, H
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Grob, KR;Kuster, MS;Yata, H
目前测量本体感觉功能的方法依赖于检测被动运动(运动感觉)或关节位置意识(关节位置感，JPS)的能力。然而，关于健康关节和病理关节本体感觉功能的报道差异很大，这可能是由于使用的方法不同所致。我们比较了几种常用的量化本体感觉的方法的有效性。30名年龄在24岁到72岁之间的健康受试者接受了五种已建立的本体感觉测试。采用两种测试方法(KT1和KT2)测量运动感觉。采用被动再生产测验(JPS1)、相对再生产测验(JPS2)和视觉估计测验(JPS3)三种测试方法测量JPS，但运动感觉测验和JPS测验之间以及不同JPS测验之间没有相关性。然而，运动感觉测试之间存在显著的相关性(r=0.86)。因此，我们得出结论，在一项测试中具有给定结果的受试者在另一项本体感觉测试中不会自动获得类似的结果。由于它们描述了不同的功能本体感觉属性，本体感觉能力不能从动觉或JPS的独立测试中推断出来。
Current methods of measurement of proprioceptive function depend on the ability to detect passive movement (kinaesthesia) or the awareness of joint position (joint position sense, JPS). However, reports of proprioceptive function in healthy and pathological joints are quite variable, which may be due to the different methods used. We have compared the validity of several frequently used methods to quantify proprioception.Thirty healthy subjects aged between 24 and 72 years underwent five established tests of proprioception. Two tests were used for the measurement of kinaesthesia (KT1 and KT2). Three tests were used for the measurement of JPS, a passive reproduction test (JPS1), a relative reproduction test (JPS2) and a visual estimation test (JPS3).There was no correlation between the tests for kinaesthesia and JPS or between the different JPS tests. There was, however, a significant correlation between the tests for kinaesthesia (r = 0.86). We conclude therefore that a subject with a given result in one test will not automatically obtain a similar result in another test for proprioception. Since they, describe different functional proprioceptive attributes, proprioceptive ability cannot be inferred from independent tests of either kinaesthesia or JPS.