Response to the calculation of population attributable fractions (PAFs) of risk factors for hepatitis C transmission.
Response to the calculation of population attributable fractions (PAFs) of risk factors for hepatitis C transmission.
复制标题
对丙型肝炎传播危险因素人群归因分数 (PAF) 计算的响应。
DOI：
10.1097/qad.0000000000001090
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Bremer,Viviane
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Schmidt,AxelJeremias;Bremer,Viviane
然而，Hagan等人[1]似乎忽视了这样一个事实，即在许多配对的病例对照研究中，对照不能代表总体，因为配对引入了偏见。这是由Cole和McMahon[2]和RockHill等人[3]解释的，并适用于Schmidt等人[4]和Fierer等人的参考病例对照研究[5]。另一种被广泛使用的公式是“当存在混淆时”[3，6]
However, Hagan et al.[1] appear to overlook the fact that, in many matched case–control studies, controls are not representative of the population, because matching has introduced bias. This is explained by Cole and McMahon [2] and Rockhill et al.[3], and applies to the referenced case–control studies of Schmidt et al.[4] and Fierer et al.[5]. The alternative and widely used formula for situations ‘when confounding exists’[3, 6] is