Evidence of domain swapping within the jumonji family of transcription factors
Evidence of domain swapping within the jumonji family of transcription factors
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/s0968-0004(00)01593-0
复制
发表时间:
2000-06-01
影响因子:
13.8
通讯作者:
Ronne, H
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Balciunas, D;Ronne, H
Most transcription factors have highly conserved DNA-binding domains, whereas there is less sequence conservation elsewhere. They are therefore usually classified into families according to their type of DNA-binding domain. However, we have found one case that defies this view; a group of eukaryotic transcription factors that possess several different kinds of DNA-binding domains seem to be descended from the same ancestral polypeptide, suggesting a pattern of domain swapping during evolution.The proteins are found in animals, plants and fungi. They all share a domain first noted in the mammalian jumonji, Smcx and RBP2 proteins1, but several other proteins that contain this domain have subsequently been found2 (Fig. 1). Remarkably, although they all share the jumonji similarity, they contain several different kinds of known or proposed DNA-binding domains. Many of them contain a dead ringer domain3 and one or more PHD fingers4, 5. Some of them also have an atypical PHD finger with the structure Cys5-His-Cys2. Three proteins have classical zinc fingers6, whereas two contain a new conserved domain (PER, for ‘peregrin-like’; see Fig. 1), which is also found in peregrin7 and several other eukaryotic proteins. The PER domain is adjacent to, but distinct from, a previously noted PHD finger in peregrin, the C-terminal part of which is also conserved in all proteins containing the PER domain. The PER domain itself has nine conserved cysteines and two histidines in a finger-like pattern that differs from both PHD fingers and classical zinc fingers. Three Arabidopsis proteins contain another new domain that is rich in phenylalanines and tyrosines (FYR, for ‘FY-rich’; see Fig. 1). The fact that the jumonji-like domain is found in proteins with unrelated DNA-binding domains could mean that it has been transferred from one protein family to another during evolution. However, our examination of the sequences revealed that this interpretation is unlikely to be correct. We found that all proteins containing the jumonji-like domain also share a second highly conserved domain, which is located close to the N terminus (Fig. 2). This new domain, which we call the jmjN domain, is shorter than the more C-terminal one, hereafter referred to as the jmjC domain, but its sequence is just as conserved. The similarity between these proteins therefore has a bipartite structure. This finding is crucial, as the assumption that the jmjC domain has