Reconstructing the ACM code of ethics and teaching computer ethics
Reconstructing the ACM code of ethics and teaching computer ethics
复制标题
重构 ACM 道德规范并教授计算机道德
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1998
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
D. Gotterbarn
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
D. Gotterbarn
the new code covers a broader scope of concern, and the sections are organized based upon an increasing levels of responsibility as a professional. The first section relates to individual responsibility; the second, to the responsibilities of a computer professional with specific ethical concerns related to computing; and the third, to the responsibilities of an organizational leader who is charged to consider the greater social impact of computer systems. In some respects, the new code is less specific than the previous code, but it covers more issues. The guidelines accompanying the new code are more helpful in assisting the member to interpret the imperatives for decision-making. Overall the new code provides a stronger set of constraints and more direction for ethical professional behavior than the previous disciplinary rules. A fundamental question to ask about the new A C M Code of Ethics is: Can it be used by the computer practitioner in to make ethical decisions? Frankel [1] characterized a "good" code of ethics for a profession as follows: l) it is an enabling document in that it "enables" the practitioner to make the right decisions; 2) it is a deterrent to unethical behavior; 3) it is a source of public evaluation of the profession and, in fact, it enhances the reputation of profession; 4) it is a source of professional socialization, helping practitioners in training to become socialized into their shared values and goals of their profession; 5) it provides a support system (moral, legal, financial) to members who make tough ethical decisions; and 6) it provides a basis for the adjudication of ethical controversies. So far we can say that the A C M Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct is an example of the evolving sense of social responsibility that has accompanied the developing technology. It does encompass all of the broad issues of ethical concern raised by computer technology, except for the establishment of certification standards for computer professionals. The jury is still out on whether the code has had any impact on public perception of the computing professional. C o m p a r e d to its predecessor, however, the new code provides more direction to the A C M membership to deal with emerging ethical issues resulting from advancements in the computer field. I f we understand the various functions of a code of ethics we are in better position to use it …