Evaluation of an Intravitreal Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant versus Standard Systemic Therapy in Noninfectious Posterior Uveitis

Evaluation of an Intravitreal Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant versus Standard Systemic Therapy in Noninfectious Posterior Uveitis
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.11.027
复制
发表时间:
2010-03-01
期刊:
影响因子:
13.7
通讯作者:
Usner, Dale W.
Usner, Dale W.
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Pavesio, Carlos;Zierhut, Manfred;Usner, Dale W.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:评估玻璃体内注射氟轻松 (FA) 植入物与标准治疗相比,对非感染性后葡萄膜炎 (NIPU) 受试者的安全性和有效性。设计:随机、对照、2b/3 期、开放标签、多中心优越性试验。参与者:单侧或双侧 NIPU 受试者。方法:140 名受试者接受 0.59 mg FA 玻璃体内植入物 (n = 66)或标准护理(SOC;n = 74),全身性泼尼松龙或等效皮质类固醇作为单一疗法(>= 0.2 mg/kg 每日),或者,如果研究者判断有必要,则采用免疫抑制剂加较低剂量的泼尼松龙或等效皮质类固醇(>= 0.1 mg/kg 每日)联合治疗。主要结果指标:葡萄膜炎首次复发的时间。结果:接受 FA 的眼睛玻璃体内植入物观察到的葡萄膜炎复发发生延迟(P < 0.01),且葡萄膜炎复发率较低(18.2% vs. 63.5%;P
Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of an intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide (FA) implant compared with standard therapy in subjects with noninfectious posterior uveitis (NIPU).Design: Randomized, controlled, phase 2b/3, open-label, multicenter superiority trial.Participants: Subjects with unilateral or bilateral NIPU.Methods: One hundred forty subjects received either a 0.59-mg FA intravitreal implant (n = 66) or standard of care (SOC; n = 74) with either systemic prednisolone or equivalent corticosteroid as monotherapy (>= 0.2 mg/kg daily) or, if judged necessary by the investigator, combination therapy with an immunosuppressive agent plus a lower dose of prednisolone or equivalent corticosteroid (>= 0.1 mg/kg daily).Main Outcome Measures: Time to first recurrence of uveitis.Results: Eyes that received the FA intravitreal implant experienced delayed onset of observed recurrence of uveitis (P < 0.01) and a lower rate of recurrence of uveitis (18.2% vs. 63.5%; P