Viewpoint: vaccine inequity in the spotlight.
Viewpoint: vaccine inequity in the spotlight.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1136/archdischild-2021-322940
复制
发表时间:
2022-12
影响因子:
5.2
通讯作者:
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Vaccine inequity has never before been in the public eye as it has been in the last months. The profound inequities in COVID-19 vaccine supply which have been allowed to develop, driven largely by perceived national self-interest, reached the world stage at the G7 meeting in June. Despite this, less than 2% of the population of many lowincome African countries have been vaccinated against COVID-19, while more than half of those living in most high-income settings have received at least one, and in many case two vaccine doses. An increasing number of countries are now vaccinating children from the age of 12, despite risk–benefit analysis being less certain, and are stock-piling vaccines for booster immunisations, in the absence of indication that these will be required on widespread basis. Both approaches are in direct conflict with the current position of the WHO. The primary arguments that have been put forward to address these inequities have focused on self-protection (‘Nobody is safe until everybody is safe’) and on ensuring global economic recovery. An expectation that counties will donate ‘surplus’ vaccines has also largely replaced the premise of vaccine equity. Although it may be that only arguments appealing ultimately to national self-interest have the necessary traction, they are largely specific to pandemic COVID-19 vaccination, thus do not put the current inequalities in their wider context. Such context is essential, given the ultimate aim must surely be to minimise all excess vaccine-preventable deaths due to the pandemic, rather than solely those deaths directly attributable to SARS-CoV-2 infection.Modelling studies and WHO policy recommendations have supported sustaining routine childhood immunisation throughout the pandemic. 1 2 However, vaccine programmes in many countries in sub-Saharan Africa are fragile; having limited capacity to cover for either delays in vaccine supply, or for having additional demands placed on staff and resources—both of which have occurred to an unprecedented level during the current pandemic. Mass vaccination campaigns, including for measles and polio, which are essential to maintaining population immunity and to outbreak response, have also been delayed. In addition, reductions in vaccination coverage for such programmatic reasons are being multiplied by misinformation and rumours circulating, for example, suggesting COVID-19 vaccines are being deployed in Africa for the purpose of population control. 3 From our own experience in The Gambia, such rumours are having a negative impact on vaccine confidence overall and hence on the uptake of other vaccines. Given these factors, progress addressing the pre-existing inequities in the availability of life-saving vaccines across sub-Saharan African, as set out last year in the Immunization Agenda 2030—itself a roadmap to ‘leave no one behind’4—will be reversed if not considered in tandem with efforts to address the current inequity in COVID-19 vaccine supply. Hundreds of thousands of under 5 years old continue to die annually from vaccine-preventable pneumococcal and Haemophilus influenzae type b disease, and from rotavirus diarrhoea. The number of preventable deaths from measles increased to beyond 200 000 again globally in 2019 and any transient reduction in cases reported during the pandemic due to reduced population movement and social mixing, combined with compromised surveillance, are expected to rebound. Polio eradication is also at a critical juncture as cases of vaccine-derived poliovirus increase rapidly, particularly in West Africa. The 2022–2026 Polio Eradication Strategy, launched in June this year …
影响因子:
34.3
作者:
Abbas, Kaja;Procter, Simon R.;Flasche, Stefan
通讯作者:
Flasche, Stefan
DOI:
10.11604/pamj.2021.38.3.27401
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
The Pan African medical journal
影响因子:
--
作者:
Afolabi AA;Ilesanmi OS
通讯作者:
Ilesanmi OS