Interactive comment on “The sensitivity of Secondary Organic Aerosol component partitioning to the predictions of component properties: part 2; determination of particle hygroscopicity and its dependence on “apparent” volatility” by D. O. Topping et al
Interactive comment on “The sensitivity of Secondary Organic Aerosol component partitioning to the predictions of component properties: part 2; determination of particle hygroscopicity and its dependence on “apparent” volatility” by D. O. Topping et al
复制标题
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2011
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
D. O. Topping
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
D. O. Topping
closely examine the consequences of their claims for previous laboratory and field studies of hygroscopicity. The limit of discussion by the authors is on page 9030 when they state: “However, discrepancies in measurements of SOA particle hygroscopicity with multiple instruments have been reported in chamber experiments that could be attributable to effects such as those described here (Good et al., 2010;Duplissy et al., 2009), as has failure to achieve closure under nitrate rich conditions attributed to HTDMA evaporation of semi-volatiles”. Specifically, I think it is important that the authors expand on the phrase “that could be attributable to effects such as those described here”. Based on their description of the effect, it may be important to classify techniques according to how likely the equilibrium partitioning is to be maintained throughout the experiment. For example, measurements using a HTDMA approach might be expected to be susceptible to repartitioning to a different degree to EDB measurements. In the latter, the partitioning into a gas phase of continually flushed wet/dry nitrogen will be irreversible whereas measurements made using the former approach may, to some extent, allow the repartitioning to be reversible. In this case, the reported GFs could, presumably, just include an inherent correction factor for the greater partitioning by mass into the condensed phase at higher RH.