Three-factor model of schizotypal personality: Invariance across culture, gender, religious affiliation, family adversity, and psychopathology

Three-factor model of schizotypal personality: Invariance across culture, gender, religious affiliation, family adversity, and psychopathology
复制标题

DOI:
10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033481
复制
发表时间:
2000-01-01
影响因子:
6.6
通讯作者:
Mednick, SA
Mednick, SA
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Reynolds, CA;Raine, A;Mednick, SA

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

虽然精神分裂症的综合征方法最近证明了精神分裂型人格三因素模型的差异相关性,但这些因素性质的变化对这种方法的基本假设提出了质疑。本研究使用分裂型人格问卷 (SPQ) 在 1,201 名毛里求斯人的样本中测试了分裂型人格因素结构的竞争模型。还评估了跨性别、种族、家庭逆境和宗教以及跨精神病理学选择群体的因素不变性。结果表明,认知感知缺陷、人际缺陷和组织混乱三因素模型是不同群体之间个体差异的基础。其他竞争的三因素分裂型人格模型并没有更好地拟合数据,有人认为三因素混乱模型是 DSM 分裂型人格在社区样本中复制良好的模型,但可能不是在某些临床样本中。
Whilst the syndrome approach to schizotypy has recently demonstrated differential correlates of a three factor model of schizotypal personality, variations in the nature of these factors question a basic assumption of this approach. This study tested competing models of the factor structure of schizotypal personality using the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire (SPQ) in a sample of 1,201 Mauritians. Factor invariance across gender, ethnicity, family adversity, and religion and across a psychopathologically select group was also assessed. Results suggest that a three-factor model, Cognitive-Perceptual Deficits, Interpersonal Deficits, and Disorganization, underlies individual differences across widely varying groups. Other competing three-factor schizotypal personality models did not fit the data better, it is argued that the three-factor Disorganized model is a well-replicated model of DSM schizotypal personality in community samples but possibly not in some clinical samples.