Preoperative Gemcitabine-based Chemoradiation Therapy for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer.
Preoperative Gemcitabine-based Chemoradiation Therapy for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer.
复制标题
用于可切除和临界可切除胰腺癌的术前基于吉西他滨的放化疗。
DOI:
10.1097/sla.0000000000000685
复制
发表时间:
2015
影响因子:
9
通讯作者:
G. Fusai
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
R. Ravikumar;G. Fusai
To the Editor: We congratulate the authors not only for their brilliant results but also for highlighting the role of neoadjuvant treatment in the management of patients with pancreatic cancer. The potential benefit of preoperative chemoradiation with or without induction chemotherapy has been long recognized but is commonly avoided in the treatment of resectable lesions because of the potential risk of tumor progression. On the contrary, the borderline resectable group offers a great opportunity to investigate the value of neoadjuvant modalities as the ideal management of these patients is still unknown, differs across the world, and, most importantly, the definition of this condition remains controversial. In this study, the authors applied similar criteria to those suggested by the MD Anderson group in 2006, but the resectability status was defined exclusively by the relationship between the arterial structures and the tumor. In particular, only those patients with limited arterial involvement (no more than 180 degrees of circumferential abutment of the vessel) were considered borderline resectable. Ultimately, 54% of patients in the borderlineresectable group were resected after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and a documented, still not necessarily significant, tumor response. Indeed, pancreatic cancer is associated with intense stromal reaction and fibrosis, which rarely results in sufficient downstaging to restore a normal tissue plane between the artery and the tumor. It is therefore surprising that only 3 patients in this group required reconstruction of the common hepatic artery. As such, it is difficult to reconcile this with an astonishing R0 rate of 98%, even after considering the variation in histopathological reporting across different units, due to the lack of standardization of sampling and processing of periampullary tumors. Second, a 34% 5-year survival in this group is a remarkable achievement in support of neoadjuvant chemoradiation. It further