Reliability of the alcohol and drug modules of the alcohol use disorder and associated disabilities interview schedule alcohol/drug-revised (AUDADIS-ADR): an international comparison
Reliability of the alcohol and drug modules of the alcohol use disorder and associated disabilities interview schedule alcohol/drug-revised (AUDADIS-ADR): an international comparison
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/s0376-8716(97)00088-4
复制
发表时间：
1997-09-25
影响因子：
4.2
通讯作者：
Mager, D
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Chatterji, S;Saunders, JB;Mager, D
本研究的目的是检查的酒精和药物模块的AUDADIS-ADR在三个网站的重测信度：班加罗尔，印度，杰贝尔，罗马尼亚和悉尼，澳大利亚。ICD-10，DSM-IV和DSM-III-R依赖诊断的整体可靠性被认为是良好到优秀的每种物质，包括酒精，在每个时间范围内，无论是总样本或用户子样本计算。与相应的有害使用和滥用诊断相关的可靠性好坏参半，但普遍较低。班加罗尔的可靠性统计数据普遍低于杰贝尔和悉尼研究中心，尤其是酒精诊断标准。这些结果的影响进行了讨论，在网站内的差异访谈协议分析的结果，在未来的修订AUDADIS-ADR及其培训程序，适合发展中国家。(C)1997 Elsevier Science爱尔兰有限公司
The purpose of the present study was to examine the test-retest reliability of the alcohol and drug modules of the AUDADIS-ADR in three sites: Bangalore, India, Jebel, Romania and Sydney, Australia. The overall reliability of ICD-10, DSM-IV and DSM-III-R dependence diagnoses was found to be good to excellent for each substance, including alcohol, for each time frame, regardless of whether the total sample or user subsample figured into the calculations. Reliability associated with corresponding harmful use and abuse diagnoses were mixed, but generally lower. Reliability statistics for Bangalore were generally lower than those of the Jebel and Sydney sites, particularly for alcohol diagnostic criteria. Implications of these results are discussed, in conjunction with results from the discrepancy interview protocol analyses within sites, in terms of future revisions to the AUDADIS-ADR and its training procedures tailored to developing countries. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.