ASSESSING SIMILARITY BETWEEN PROFILES

ASSESSING SIMILARITY BETWEEN PROFILES
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/h0057173
复制
发表时间:
1953-01-01
影响因子:
22.4
通讯作者:
GLESER, GC
GLESER, GC
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
CRONBACH, LJ;GLESER, GC

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

一般方法的困难进行了讨论,特别是;需要讨论的相似性只与特定的尺寸,损失的信息时,配置减少到指数,需要解释的相似性指数作为一个相对的,而不是作为一个绝对的措施,和一般的非可比性的规模单位参与配置文件。给出了测度D。对于两个轮廓,这是相应分数的平方偏差之和,并且是相异性(k变量超空间中的距离)的一般表达式。27篇参考文献。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2016阿帕,保留所有权利)
General methodological difficulties are discussed, particularly; the need to discuss similarity only with respect to specified dimensions, loss of information involved when configurations are reduced to indices, the need to interpret a similarity index as a relative rather than as an absolute measure, and the general non-comparability of scale units involved in profiles. The measure D is presented. This is, for two profiles, the sum of the squared deviations of corresponding scores, and is a general expression for dissimilarity (distance in the hyperspace of k variates). 27 references.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)