Evaluation of a modified version of the index of Oral Impacts On Daily Performances (OIDP) in elderly populations in two European countries.

Evaluation of a modified version of the index of Oral Impacts On Daily Performances (OIDP) in elderly populations in two European countries.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1111/j.1741-2358.2001.00121.x
复制
发表时间:
2001-12-01
期刊:
影响因子:
2
通讯作者:
Sheiham, A
Sheiham, A
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Tsakos, G;Marcenes, W;Sheiham, A

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:研究英国和希腊两个欧洲国家老年人口腔对日常表现影响指数(OIDP)修正版的心理测量学特性。本研究考察的心理测量性质包括内在一致性和面、内容、标准和构念效度。设计与环境:对65岁或以上独立生活的人群进行横断面流行病学调查。数据由采访者通过结构化问卷收集。英国的样本包括随机选择的独立生活的人,他们参加了国家饮食和营养调查(NDNS)的牙科部分,年龄在65岁或以上。希腊样本是一个机会样本,从居住在雅典地区两个城市的符合条件的人中抽取。受试者:英国753人,希腊681人。结果:通过两国的试点工作,对OIDP指数进行了修改,希腊和英国的修改版本均表现出满意的表面效度和内容效度。在主要研究中,修改后的OIDP在希腊样本中的Cronbach’s alpha为0.77,在英国样本中的Cronbach’s alpha为0.69。在这两个样本中,该指数显示与感知的牙科治疗需求有非常显著的关联(p
OBJECTIVE: To examine the psychometric properties of a modified version of the index of Oral Impacts on Daily Performance (OIDP) in elderly populations in two European countries, namely Great Britain and Greece. The psychometric properties examined in this study refer to internal consistency and face, content, criterion and construct validity.DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional epidemiologic surveys of independently living people aged 65 years or older. Data were collected by interviewers through structured questionnaires. The British sample consisted of the randomly selected independently living persons that participated in the dental component of the National Diet and Nutrition Survey (NDNS) of adults aged 65 years or over. The Greek sample is an opportunity sample drawn from eligible people living in two municipalities of the Athens region.SUBJECTS: 753 people participated in the British and 681 in the Greek sample.RESULTS: Through pilot work in both countries, the OIDP index was modified and both Greek and British modified versions demonstrated satisfactory face and content validity. In the main studies, Cronbach's alpha of the modified OIDP was 0.77 for the Greek and 0.69 for the British sample. In both samples, the index showed very significant associations with perceived dental treatment need (p