Pictorial health warning labels on the waterpipe device are effective in reducing smoking satisfaction, puffing behaviour and exposure to CO: first evidence from a crossover clinical laboratory study
Pictorial health warning labels on the waterpipe device are effective in reducing smoking satisfaction, puffing behaviour and exposure to CO: first evidence from a crossover clinical laboratory study
复制标题
DOI：
10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054682
复制
发表时间：
2019-08-01
期刊：
影响因子：
5.2
通讯作者：
Asfar, Taghrid
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Maziak, Wasim;Ben Taleb, Ziyad;Asfar, Taghrid
目的本研究旨在探讨图形健康警告标签（HWL）的水管（WP）设备上的吸烟者的经验，吸烟行为，危害的感知和暴露于呼吸道toxics.Methods交叉设计研究30 WP吸烟者完成了两个45分钟的自由吸烟会议（WP没有HWL与WP与HWL）。在每次吸烟之前和之后测量呼出的一氧化碳（eCO）。在整个吸烟会话中记录了抽吸地形，参与者完成了调查问卷，评估主观吸烟经验和伤害perception.Results显着差异，观察到两个研究条件之间的eCO水平，与较低水平的eCO升压记录吸烟后的WP装有HWL（16 ppm）相比，WP没有HWL（22.7 ppm）。与使用HWL的WP相比，使用无HWL的WP时，参与者的抽吸次数更多，抽吸间隔更短，总抽吸量更高（p值
Objectives This study examined the effect of pictorial health warning labels (HWLs) on the waterpipe (WP) device on smokers' experience, puffing behaviour, harm perception and exposure to respiratory toxicants.Methods Thirty WP smokers completed two 45min ad libitum smoking sessions (WP without HWL vs WP with HWL) in a crossover design study. Exhaled carbon monoxide (eCO) was measured before and after each smoking session. Puff topography was recorded throughout the smoking session, and participants completed survey questionnaires assessing subjective smoking experiences and harm perception.Results Significant differences were observed in eCO levels between the two study conditions, with lower levels of eCO boost recorded following smoking the WP fitted with HWL (16 ppm) compared with WP without HWL (22.7 ppm). Participants had more puffs, shorter interpuff intervals and a higher total puff volume during smoking the WP without HWL relative to WP with HWL (p values