Time-varying effects of families and peers on adolescent marijuana use: Person-environment interactions across development.

Time-varying effects of families and peers on adolescent marijuana use: Person-environment interactions across development.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1017/s0954579416000559
复制
发表时间:
2017-08
影响因子:
3.3
通讯作者:
Haggerty KP
Haggerty KP
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Epstein M;Hill KG;Roe SS;Bailey JA;Iacono WG;McGue M;Kristman-Valente A;Catalano RF;Haggerty KP

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

研究表明,两个众所周知的青少年药物使用预测因素——家庭监控和反社会同伴——的影响不是静态的,而是随着青春期的发展而变化的。此外,这些影响可能对不同的青年群体有所不同。目前的研究使用时变效应模型(TVEM)来检验11至19岁家庭监控、反社会同伴和大麻使用之间关系的变化,并通过性别和行为解除抑制水平来比较这些关系。数据来自养育健康儿童研究,这是一个对1040名青少年进行的纵向调查。家庭监控、反社会同伴和大麻使用之间的联系在青春期基本稳定,女孩比男孩更强。这种关联强度的差异也体现在行为去抑制水平上:去抑制水平较低的青少年更容易受到父母和同伴的影响。家庭监控对女孩和不受抑制的青少年的影响在青春期中期最为明显,而反社会同伴的影响在青春期中后期更为显著。讨论了大麻预防干预的时机和目标的含义。
Studies have demonstrated that the effects of two well-known predictors of adolescent substance use, family monitoring and antisocial peers, are not static but change over the course of adolescence. Moreover, these effects may differ for different groups of youth. The current study uses time-varying effect modeling (TVEM) to examine the changes in the association between family monitoring and antisocial peers and marijuana use from ages 11 to 19, and to compare these associations by gender and levels of behavioral disinhibition. Data are drawn from the Raising Healthy Children study, a longitudinal panel of 1,040 youth. The strength of association between family monitoring and antisocial peers and marijuana use was mostly steady over adolescence, and was greater for girls than boys. Differences in the strength of the association were also evident by levels of behavioral disinhibition: youth with lower levels of disinhibition were more susceptible to the influence of parents and peers. Stronger influence of family monitoring on girls and less disinhibited youth was most evident in middle adolescence, whereas the stronger effect of antisocial peers was significant during middle and late adolescence. Implications for the timing and targeting of marijuana preventive interventions are discussed.