Heat pump assisted extractive distillation sequences with intermediate-boiling entrainer

Heat pump assisted extractive distillation sequences with intermediate-boiling entrainer
复制标题

具有中沸点共沸剂的热泵辅助萃取蒸馏序列

DOI:
10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116511
复制
发表时间:
2021-03
影响因子:
6.4
通讯作者:
Du Jian
Du Jian
中科院分区:
工程技术2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wang Chao;Zhuang Yu;Liu Linlin;Zhang Lei;Du Jian

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

目前,还没有研究集中在提高经济效率和环境可持续性的经典萃取精馏(CED)过程中,通过使用蒸汽再压缩热泵(VRHP)和中沸精馏塔。为了提高直接CED(DCED)和间接CED(IECD)分离丙酮/正庚烷共沸物的经济性和环境可持续性,引入了VRHP结构和中沸物苯。采用序贯迭代法对DCED和ICED进行优化,以年总费用(TAC)最小为目标。此外,六个独立的VRHP-DCED和六个独立的VRHP-ICED序列的设计和优化,以尽量减少蒸汽和电力消耗。结果表明,ICED工艺优于DCED工艺,部分VRHP-CED工艺在经济性、节能性和环保性方面优于ICED工艺。与ICED相比,VRHP-DCED(V)序列的蒸汽消耗量最小,比ICED序列减少83.38%,而VRHP-ICED(IV′)序列的总可吸入空气总量和烟气排放量最小,比ICED序列分别减少8.24%和26.87%。
Currently, no research has focused on improving the economic efficiency and environmental sustainability of the classic extractive distillation (CED) process through using both vapor recompression heat pump (VRHP) and intermediate-boiling entrainer. In this paper, both VRHP configuration and intermediate-boiling entrainer benzene are introduced to improve economic efficiency and environmental sustainability of the direct CED (DCED) and indirect CED (IECD) sequences for separating the acetone/n-heptane azeotrope. The DCED and ICED are optimized by sequential iterative procedure, aiming at the minimum total annual costs (TAC). Furthermore, six independent VRHP-DCED and six independent VRHP-ICED sequences are designed and optimized to minimize steam and electricity consumption. The results illustrate that the ICED sequence can outperform the DCED sequence, while a part of the VRHP-CED sequences demonstrate the advantages compared to the ICED sequence in terms of economic, energy and environmental performance. The comparison with the ICED sequence shows that the VRHP-DCED (V) sequences with the minimum steam consumption can cause a decrease by 83.38%, while the VRHP-ICED (IV′) sequences with the minimum TAC and gas emissions can cause a reduction by 8.24% and 26.87% compared with the ICED sequence, respectively.
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115228
发表时间: 2020-06
影响因子: 6.4
作者:
Qingjun Zhang;Shunjin Yang;Peng Shi;Wei-xiao Hou;A. Zeng;Youguang Ma;Xigang Yuan
通讯作者: Qingjun Zhang;Shunjin Yang;Peng Shi;Wei-xiao Hou;A. Zeng;Youguang Ma;Xigang Yuan
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2018.06.017
发表时间: 2018-08
影响因子: 3.9
作者:
Chao Wang;Chao Guang;Yue Cui;Chen Wang;Zhishan Zhang
通讯作者: Chao Wang;Chao Guang;Yue Cui;Chen Wang;Zhishan Zhang
DOI: 10.1080/01457632.2018.1451246
发表时间: 2019-07
影响因子: 2.3
作者:
Ye. Belyayev;M. Mohanraj;S. Jayaraj;A. Kaltayev
通讯作者: Ye. Belyayev;M. Mohanraj;S. Jayaraj;A. Kaltayev
DOI: 10.1002/aic.690380902
发表时间: 1992-09
期刊: Aiche Journal
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
L. Laroche;N. Bekiaris;H. W. Andersen;M. Morari
通讯作者: L. Laroche;N. Bekiaris;H. W. Andersen;M. Morari
DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2015.07.001
发表时间: 2015-09
期刊: Chemical Engineering and Processing
影响因子: --
作者:
Yuliang Liu;Jianguang Zhai;Lumin Li;Lanyi Sun;Cheng Zhai
通讯作者: Yuliang Liu;Jianguang Zhai;Lumin Li;Lanyi Sun;Cheng Zhai