Conceptualizing historical organization studies
Conceptualizing historical organization studies
复制标题
历史组织研究的概念化
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
S. Clegg
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Maclean;C. Harvey;S. Clegg
组织研究和历史研究之间更紧密结合的前景早已得到认可。然而，它的潜力仍然没有得到满足：组织研究所期望的理论发展的真实性和历史研究所要求的历史真实性的真实性对研究人员提出了特殊的概念和经验要求。我们详细阐述了历史组织研究的思想，组织研究广泛借鉴历史数据，方法和知识，以促进历史上知情的理论叙述注意到这两个学科。在先前研究的基础上，我们提出了组织研究中四种不同的历史概念的类型学：历史评估，解释，概念化和叙述。我们确定了历史组织研究的五个原则-双重完整性，多元理解，代表性的真理，上下文敏感性和理论流畅性-并从整体的角度说明我们的类型学。
The promise of a closer union between organizational and historical research has long been recognized. However, its potential remains unfulfilled: the authenticity of theory development expected by organization studies and the authenticity of historical veracity required by historical research place exceptional conceptual and empirical demands on researchers. We elaborate the idea of historical organization studies—organizational research that draws extensively on historical data, methods, and knowledge to promote historically informed theoretical narratives attentive to both disciplines. Building on prior research, we propose a typology of four differing conceptions of history in organizational research: history as evaluating, explicating, conceptualizing, and narrating. We identify five principles of historical organization studies—dual integrity, pluralistic understanding, representational truth, context sensitivity, and theoretical fluency—and illustrate our typology holistically from the perspective ...
安德鲁·卡内基和当代企业家慈善事业的基础
影响因子：
1.1
作者：
Harvey C
通讯作者：
Harvey C