Translation and associative priming with cross-lingual pseudohomophones: Evidence for nonselective phonological activation in bilinguals
Translation and associative priming with cross-lingual pseudohomophones: Evidence for nonselective phonological activation in bilinguals
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1340
复制
发表时间：
2005-11-01
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
Duyck, W
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Duyck, W
通过使用荷兰-英语双语者完成的词汇判断任务，作者发现对视觉呈现的第一语言(如Touw)和第二语言(L2；例如Back)目标的识别分别受到L2和L1掩蔽启动的促进，它们是目标语翻译等价物(ROAP和RUGH)的伪同音节(ROAP和RUCH)。此外，L2目标(例如教堂)的识别也受到相关单词的L1伪同音素(POU[POE])的促进。相反，没有观察到L1靶(例如BE[LEG])和L2伪同音联想引物(KNEA)的启动。最后，作者发现，二语目标词(例如，角)被其母语翻译对应物(Hoek)的更频繁的L2(语内)同音(例如，钩子)所促进。这些发现有力地表明了双语者语音表征的非语言依赖性激活，并与双语交互激活加模型的时间延迟假设相一致(A.Dijkstra&W.Van Heuven，2002)。
Using a lexical-decision task performed by Dutch-English bilinguals, the author showed that the recognition of visually presented first language (L1; e.g., touw) and second language (L2; e.g., back) targets is facilitated by L2 and L1 masked primes, respectively, which are pseudohomophones (roap and ruch) of the target's translation equivalent (rope and rug). Moreover, recognition of L2 targets (e.g., church) was also facilitated by L1 pseudohomophones (pous) of related words (paus [pope]). Contrastingly, no priming was observed for L1 targets (e.g., been [leg]) and L2 pseudohomophone associative primes (knea). Finally, the author found that an L2 target word (e.g., corner) is facilitated by a more frequent L2 (intralingual) homophone (e.g., hook) of its L1 translation equivalent (hoek). These findings strongly suggest language-independent activation of phonological representations in bilinguals and are compatible with the temporal delay assumption of the bilingual interactive activation plus model (A. Dijkstra & W. Van Heuven, 2002).