Consumers and evaluation of interactive health communication applications
Consumers and evaluation of interactive health communication applications
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00104-4
复制
发表时间:
1999-01-01
影响因子:
5.5
通讯作者:
Brennan, PF
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gustafson, DH;Robinson, TN;Brennan, PF
Interactive health communication (IHC) applica-tions, through their information, emotional support, decision support and behavior change services, have the potential to dramatically improve the public’s quality of life and reduce the total burden of illness and injury. Their emergence has been fueled by the growth and increasing sophistication of the Internet, which allows geographic barriers to fall and offers people an opportunity to learn from widely diverse resources. But their growth will be fertilized by the propensity for the health care system to push health care away from institutions, specialists, and even primary care providers. As patients are spending less time in the hospital and with their health care providers, they are being forced to assume more responsibility for their care, but often not provided resources to do it. Moreover, the increasing complexity of medicine, pressures for increased productivity, and growing recognition that there is more to dealing with illness than the standard medical model, is prompting providers to share responsibility with patients. There has been a separate but reinforcing trend toward patients and families wanting to participate in their own health care. The elderly, a growing percentage of the population, are becoming more assertive participants. Baby boomers, who have generally been more assertive, are moving into their late 40s and 50s, a time when chronic health conditions start to emerge and interactions with the medical system increase. 1 This assertiveness is generally good, if support is available to help patients be effectively assertive. IHC applications can help fill this growing need for individuals to understand and take greater control of their health and that of their families. However, IHCs also pose a risk to consumers who cannot sort out inadequate and misleading applications from ones of high quality. The purpose of this article is to explore the potential risks and benefits of IHC applications to consumers, and discuss initiatives that may help consumers make more informed choices among IHC applications and make more-effective use of the applications they adopt. While the consumer is the ultimate beneficiary, the article is also intended for audiences who act as advocates for the consumer. For the consumer, this report addresses issues such as reasons why evaluation should be important to them, encourages development of an evaluation template customized for them in relevant language, and offers a list of consumer rights and responsibilities and how to exert them in this field. For those interested in consumer welfare, we identify opportunities in areas such as nutrition-labeling systems, research, Web-based surveys, consumer report services, and oversight through existing or new mechanisms.