Efficacy of external and internal visual imagery perspectives for the enhancement of performance on tasks in which form is important
Efficacy of external and internal visual imagery perspectives for the enhancement of performance on tasks in which form is important
复制标题
DOI：
10.1123/jsep.21.2.95
复制
发表时间：
1999-06-01
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
Callow, N
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hardy, L;Callow, N
三个实验考察了不同的意象视角对形式重要的任务表现的相对效果。在实验1中，25名经验丰富的空手道选手使用外部或内部视觉图像或拉伸来学习新形。结果表明，外部视觉意象显著优于内部视觉意象，内部视觉意象显著优于拉伸。在实验2中，40名体育科学专业的学生在四种条件下学习简单的体操地板动作：外部或内部视觉图像，有或没有动觉图像。结果显示，视觉意象视角对其有显著的主效应（外部视觉意象效果最好），而对动觉意象无显著影响。实验3采用与实验2相同的范式，但采用高能力攀岩者进行困难的巨石问题。结果显示，视觉意象视角（外部视觉意象效果最好）和动觉意象均有显著的主效应。研究结果从认知过程的角度进行了讨论，这可能是意象效应的基础。
Three experiments examined the relative efficacy of different imagery perspectives on the performance of tasks in which form was important. In Experiment 1, 25 experienced karateists learned a new kata using either external or internal visual imagery or stretching. Results indicated that external visual imagery was significantly more effective than internal visual imagery, which was significantly more effective than stretching. In Experiment 2, 40 sport science students learned a simple gymnastics floor routine under one of four conditions: external or internal visual imagery with or without kinesthetic imagery. Results revealed a significant main effect for visual imagery perspective (external visual imagery was best) but no effect for kinesthetic imagery. Experiment 3 employed the same paradigm as Experiment 2 but with high-ability rock climbers performing difficult boulder problems. Results showed significant main effects for both visual imagery perspective (external visual imagery was best) and kinesthetic imagery. The findings are discussed in terms of the cognitive processes that might underlie imagery effects.