NERVE GROWTH FACTOR
NERVE GROWTH FACTOR
复制标题
DOI:
10.1111/j.1749-6632.1964.tb33978.x
复制
发表时间:
1964-01-01
影响因子:
5.2
通讯作者:
LEVIMONTALCINI, R
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
LEVIMONTALCINI, R
Twice during the past 12 years we have had the privilege of presenting our work on the “nerve growth factor” to the New York Academy of Sciences. The first time was in the fall of 1951, when we reported on the discovery of a diffusible nerve growth factor in mouse sarcomas 180 and 37, which selectively enhances the growth and differentiation of the sympathetic ganglia in the chick embryo.’The second time was in the fall of 1959, when we reported on the diqcovery by Stanley Cohen and myself of a potent nerve growth factor in the mouse salivary glands. We also discussed, on that occasion, the effects of a specific antiserum to the salivary nerve growth factor on the sympathetic ganglia of newborn mammals.’We now present the results of our recent investigations on some aspects of the nerve growth factor as well as the results of pharmacological experiments on immunosympathectomized animals. As the first in this session, we feel however, that it may bs useful to give first a brief survey of the extensive work performe3 during these past years onthe remarkable agent which is now known as “the nerve growth factor”, or more si. mply as the NGF In 1918, Elmer Bueker reported in the Anatowical Records on the results of a bold and imaginative experiment he had performed in the chick embryo. The experiment consisted of the implantation of a fragment of mouse sarcoma 180 into the body wall of three-day chick embryos. The experiment was performed in order to see whether rapidly growing tissues such as this type of sarcoma would provide a suitable field for motor and sensory fibers emerging from the adjacent spinal cord and sensory ganglia. The embryos bearing the transplant were sacificed five days later. It was found that sensory, but no motor fibers had branched into the tumor and at the same time the ganlia providing for the innervation of the neoplastic tissue appeared about 33 per cent larger than contralateral ganglia. The author concluded that “sarcoma 180 transplants were responsible for the hypertrophy and hyperlasia observed in the lumbosacral ganglia because of intrinsic physjcochemical properties and mechanics of growth.” I