Comparison of two measures of parent-child interaction
Comparison of two measures of parent-child interaction
复制标题
DOI：
10.1097/00006199-200301000-00005
复制
发表时间：
2003-01-01
期刊：
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
Keefe, MR
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Byrne, MW;Keefe, MR
众多的亲子互动措施的背景。现有的包括几个是适当的简短的临床遭遇或研究设置的时间，成本，空间，和主题负担是criticalfactors.Objectives：本研究比较新的母婴沟通筛查（MICS）与建立护理儿童评估卫星培训（NCAST）教学量表（NCAT）。两个量表的理论基础，发展，行政支持，和出版的心理测量进行了对比。一个城市、西班牙裔、高风险样本中171例儿童与母亲互动的录像带（5个月至36个月的儿童）由两名经过培训的编码员进行评分，他们建立了.90（NCAT）和.85（MICS）的评分员间可靠性。总分的有效性相关系数为r = 0.504，P <0.001，两个最具可比性的分量表的有效性相关系数为r = 0.492，P <0.001。痛苦的定义更狭窄的MICS.Internal评分为0.89至0.94（MICS总分）（取决于所使用的子量表的选择）和0.79（NCAT）。结论：NCAT已经建立了在临床实践和研究中使用的优势，并提供二元和单独的母亲和孩子的分数。MICS对于简短的临床筛选更可行，并且在本研究中进行，具有良好的相关效度和跨年龄（婴儿期至3岁）的内部一致性。如果进行更多的临床研究验证风险类别评分，如果建立规范性数据，解释将得到加强。
The numerous parent-child interaction measures Background. available include few that are appropriate to brief clinical encounters or to research settings where time, cost, space, and subject burden are critical factors.Objectives: This study compares the newer Mother-Infant Communication Screening (MICS) with the established Nursing Child Assessment Satellite Training (NCAST) Teaching Scale (NCAT).Methods: Theoretical foundations, development, administration support, and published psychometrics for the two scales are contrasted. Videotapes of 171 caregiver-child interactions in an urban, Hispanic, high-risk sample (children aged 5 months to 36 months) were scored by two trained coders who had established inter-rater reliabilities of .90 (NCAT) and .85 (MICS).Results: Validity correlation coefficients were r = .504, p < .001 for total scores and r = .492, P < .001 for the two most comparable subscales. Distress was defined more narrowly by the MICS. Internal consistencies were .89 to .94 (MICS total scores) (depending on choice of subscales used) and .79 (NCAT).Conclusions: The NCAT has established strengths for use in clinical practice and research and provides dyadic and separate mother and child scores. The MICS is more feasible for brief clinical screening and performed in this study with promising correlate validity and internal consistency across ages (infancy through 3 years). Interpretation would be strengthened if more clinical studies verifying scores with risk categories were performed and if normative data were established.