Combinatorial group theory for pro-p groups
Combinatorial group theory for pro-p groups
复制标题
Pro-p 群的组合群论
DOI:
10.1016/0022-4049(82)90086-x
复制
发表时间:
1982
影响因子:
0.8
通讯作者:
A. Lubotzky
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Lubotzky
Although the category of pro-finite groups forms a natural extension of the category of finite groups, it carries a richer structure in that it has categorical objects and notions which do not exist in the finite case; eg projective groups and free product. The existence of such notions in the extended category leads to the definition of the usual notions of combinatorial group theory, such as free groups and defining a group by generators and relations. Topics in various fields lead to a special consideration of pro-p groups: the tower problem (cf.[21]), Galois theory over p-adic fields and Demuskin groups (cf.[20]), the interpretation of generators and relations by means of cohomology (cf.[19, 2 l]), the theory of nilpotent groups (cf.[ll]) etc. Nevertheless, there is no systematic theory (but see [6]). The aim of this paper is to begin to develop what we call combinatorial group theory for pro-p groups, although combinatorial tools do not seem to be useful here.The fundamental books on combinatorial group theory,[16] and [15] both begin with free groups, their subgroups and their automorphisms. Accordingly, we study these aspects of pro-p groups. After summarizing (in Section 2) the basic (and mostly well-known) properties of free groups and free products, we prove in Section 3 some results analogous to the theorems of Hall, Greenberg and Howson about finitely generated subgroups of free groups. In Section 5, we describe the automorphism group of finitely generated free pro-p groups, and obtain as a corollary that, contrary to the discrete case, a free pro-p group on two generators has an outer automorphism acting trivially on the commutator quotient. A central role in our work is played by the Frattini subgroup of a pro-p group; its basic properties are summarized in Section 1. This notion, whose importance to pro-p groups was first noted by Gruenberg [7], enables us to relate combinatorial group theoretic notions to group theoretic ones (see for example 3.1) and so we can replace the combinatorial methods by quite elementary group theoretic methods. Note also that our methods are free from cohomology.