On Causal Inferences for Personalized Medicine: How Hidden Causal Assumptions Led to Erroneous Causal Claims About the D-Value.
On Causal Inferences for Personalized Medicine: How Hidden Causal Assumptions Led to Erroneous Causal Claims About the D-Value.
复制标题
关于个性化医疗的因果推论:隐藏的因果假设如何导致关于 D 值的错误因果断言。
DOI:
10.1080/00031305.2019.1575771
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Robins,JamesM
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Greenland,Sander;Fay,MichaelP;Brittain,EricaH;Shih,JoannaH;Follmann,DeanA;Gabriel,ErinE;Robins,JamesM
Personalized medicine asks if a new treatment will help a particular patient, rather than if it improves the average response in a population. Without a causal model to distinguish these questions, interpretational mistakes arise. These mistakes are seen in an article by Demidenko that recommends the “D-value,” which is the probability that a randomly chosen person from the new-treatment group has a higher value for the outcome than a randomly chosen person from the control-treatment group. The abstract states “TheD-value has a clear interpretation as the proportion of patients who get worse after the treatment” with similar assertions appearing later. We show these statements are incorrect because they require assumptions about the potential outcomes which are neither testable in randomized experiments nor plausible in general. TheD-value willnotequal the proportion of patients who get worse after treatment if (as expected) those outcomes are correlated. Independence of potential outcomes is unrealistic and eliminatesanypersonalized treatment effects; with dependence, theD-value can even imply treatment is better than controleven though most patients are harmed by the treatment. Thus,D-values are misleading for personalized medicine. To prevent misunderstandings, we advise incorporating causal models into basic statistics education.