Effect of Supplemental Humate at Different Levels on the Growth Performance, Slaughter and Carcass Traits of Broilers
Effect of Supplemental Humate at Different Levels on the Growth Performance, Slaughter and Carcass Traits of Broilers
复制标题
不同水平添加腐植酸对肉鸡生长性能、屠宰及胴体性状的影响
DOI：
10.3923/ijps.2004.406.410
复制
发表时间：
2004
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
L. Turgut
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Karaoglu;M. Macit;N. Esenbuğa;H. Durdag;.. O.CevdetBilgin;L. Turgut
本试验的目的是确定补充腐殖酸盐（包括腐殖酸、黄腐酸和腐植酸）以及一些微量矿物质对肉鸡生产性能和胴体性状的影响。对 240 只 1 日龄从商业孵化场收到的雄性肉鸡 (Ross-308) 进行了一项研究。按照完全 0 1 2 3 随机实验设计，将小鸡分配到四种饮食治疗组（H 、H 、H 和 H 组）。提供饲料和水以供随意消耗，并且在整个实验期间持续照明。基础饮食 (H )、基础饮食加 0.10 (H )、0.20 (H ) 和 0 1 2 0.30 % (H ) 腐植酸盐 (Farmagulator DRY , Humate, Farmavet International Inc., Kocaeli 41400, Turkey) 均为 3 TM 0 1 2 3 差异不显着。平均每日体重增加分别为 51.8、49.8、52.9 和 49.9 克，并且补充剂对该参数没有统计学上的显着影响。日饲料消耗量分别为103.2、95.6、104.4和98.6 g，对照组与治疗组差异显着（P<0.05）。 FCR值为1.87、1.84、1.86和1.85。试验结束时，热胴体重量和产量分别为1874、1913、1912和1884克和75.78、75.51、75.55和75.55%，差异不显着。内脏重量没有差异。腹部脂肪垫重量分别为 35.5、40.33、40.0 和 32.16 克。各组之间腹部脂肪重量差异无统计学意义。 H、H 、H 和H 的死亡率分别为1.8%、0.0%、0.0% 和0.0%，各组之间没有显着差异。 0 1 2 3总之，虽然在肉鸡日粮中添加腐植酸盐对生产性能、屠宰和胴体特性没有影响，但饲喂含有 0.1% 腐植酸盐日粮的 H 组饲料转化率略有改善。此外，腐植酸1组未观察到雏鸡死亡，而对照组死亡率为1.8%。
The current trial was carried out to determine the influence of supplemental humates including humic, fulvic and ulmic acids and some microminerals on the performance and carcass traits of broilers. A study was conducted with total 240 male broiler chicks (Ross-308), received from a commercial hatchery at 1 day of age. Chicks were allocated to four dietary treatments (H , H , H and H groups) as completely 0 1 2 3 randomized experimental design . Feed and water were offered for ad libitum consumption and lightening was continuous throughout experimental period. A basal diet (H ), basal diet plus 0.10 (H ), 0.20 (H ) and 0 1 2 0.30 % (H ) humate (Farmagulator DRY , Humate, Farmavet International Inc., Kocaeli 41400, Turkey) were 3 TM 0 1 2 3 difference was not significant. Average daily weight gains were 51.8, 49.8, 52.9 and 49.9 g, respectively, and the supplementation had statistically no significant effect on this parameter. Daily feed consumptions were 103.2, 95.6, 104.4 and 98.6 g and the difference between control and treatment groups was significant (P<0.05). FCR values were 1.87, 1.84, 1.86 and 1.85. At the end of the trial, hot carcass weights and yields were 1874, 1913, 1912 and 1884 g and 75.78, 75.51, 75.55 and 75.55 %, and difference was not significant. There was no different in offal weights. Abdominal fat pad weights were found to be 35.5, 40.33, 40.0 and 32.16 g, respectively. Difference among the groups in terms of abdominal fat weights was not statistically significant. The mortality was 1.8, 0.0, 0.0 and 0.0 % for H, H , H and H and there was no significan t 0 1 2 3 different among the groups. In conclusion, although humate supplementation to diets of broilers had no effect on performance, slaughter and carcass characteristics, a slightly improvement was observed in FCR for H group fed with diet containing 0.1 % humate. In addition, it was not observed dead chick in humate 1 groups while 1.8 % of mortality in control group.