Attributing Creative Agency: Are we doing it right?
Attributing Creative Agency: Are we doing it right?
复制标题
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
O. Bown
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
O. Bown
在考虑计算系统的创造力时，人们考虑了许多因素，其中许多因素都试图测量或以其他方式操作：新奇、价值、P-创造力与H-创造力、探索与改造、人工制品的主观评价和情境化等等。虽然同样重要，在具体产出的制作中，将创造力系统地、严格地归于不同的行为者，这一点较少受到关注。人们通常会简单地假设，一件人工制品的最直接贡献者是该人工制品的唯一作者，但可以说，情况并非如此：所有人类创造力都发生在相互影响的网络中，包括累积的知识库。本文着眼于我们如何更好地正式创作suchthat任何人工制品，一组代理人可以准确地归因于他们的相对贡献的存在，该实体。它只问这种形式化的性质应该是什么，并得出结论，需要一个更关键的方法来处理人类演员的创造性机构，从而预期机器的创造性机构。我借鉴了两个关键的概念，可以通知计算创造力的创造性起源的归属方法：成为，互动网络的机构。我从历史上的人类创造力和计算创造力两个方面看了一个例子，来考虑我们如何分解创造性机构并将其归因于不同的来源。讨论了实际意义。
When contemplating the creativity of computational systems, a host of factors have been taken into consideration, many of which people have attempted to measure or otherwise operationalise: novelty, value, P-creativity versus H-creativity, exploration versus transformation, the subjective evaluation and contextualisation of the artefact, and so on. Whilst of equal importance, the systematic and rigorous attribution of creative agency to different actors in the production of a specific output has been given less attention. It is common to make the simplifying assumption that the most direct contributor to an artefact is that artefact’s sole author, but arguably this is never the case: all human creativity occurs in the context of networks of mutual influence, including a cumulative pool of knowledge. This paper looks at how we might better formalise creative authorship suchthat for any artefact, aset of agents could be precisely attributed with their relative contributions to the existence of that entity. It asks only what the nature of this formalisation should be, and concludes that a more critical approach is needed to the creative agency of human actors, and thus the expected creative agency of machines. I draw on two critical notions that can inform a methodology for the ascription of creative origins in computational creativity: becoming, and the agency of networks of interaction. I look at a example from both historical human creativity and computation creativity, to consider how we can break down creative agency and ascribe it to different sources. Practical implications are dicsussed.