EFFECTS OF SELECTIVE INTERRUPTION AND DEPRIVATION OF SLEEP IN HUMAN NEWBORN

EFFECTS OF SELECTIVE INTERRUPTION AND DEPRIVATION OF SLEEP IN HUMAN NEWBORN
复制标题

DOI:
10.1002/dev.420060110
复制
发表时间:
1973-01-01
影响因子:
2.2
通讯作者:
ROFFWARG, HP
ROFFWARG, HP
中科院分区:
心理学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
ANDERS, TF;ROFFWARG, HP

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在两项独立的研究中,研究人员调查了新生儿对睡眠阶段剥夺的反应。在第一项研究中,在一个互喂睡眠期间,新生儿被选择性地从快速眼动睡眠或非快速眼动睡眠中唤醒,并允许在不受干扰的第二阶段恢复。在第二项研究中,婴儿在一个间歇喂养期保持完全清醒,并允许他们在不受干扰的情况下睡觉。结果表明,通过人工唤醒的选择性睡眠阶段剥夺在新生儿期间是不可能实现的。相反,婴儿部分睡眠被剥夺(睡眠的两个阶段都减少了),清醒的时间增加了。在干扰期间,被打断的睡眠阶段表现出相当的“韧性”。在两项研究中,在不受干扰的恢复性睡眠中,总睡眠时间明显增加。非快速眼动睡眠比快速眼动睡眠表现出更大的优先恢复倾向。
In two separate studies, newborn infants' responses to sleep stage deprivation were investigated. In the first study, neonates were selectively awakened from either REM or NREM sleep during 1 interfeeding sleep period and allowed to recover in an undistrubed second. In the 2nd study, infants were kept totally awake for 1 interfeeding period and allowed to sleep undisturbed during the next. The results indicate that selective sleep stage deprivation by manual awakenings was impossible to achieve during the newborn period. Rather, the infants were partially sleep deprived (both stages of sleep were reduced) with increased amounts of wakefulness. During the disturbance the interrupted sleep stage demonstrated considerable “tenacity.” During undisturbed recovery sleep, in both studies, total sleep time was markedly increased. NREM sleep demonstrated a greater tendency for preferential recovery than REM sleep.