Dissent on the Periphery? Island Nationalisms and European Integration

Dissent on the Periphery? Island Nationalisms and European Integration
复制标题

外围有异议?

DOI:
10.1080/01402382.2011.572395
复制
发表时间:
2011
影响因子:
4.2
通讯作者:
Hepburn E
Hepburn E
中科院分区:
法学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hepburn E

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

许多学者认为无国籍民族主义和地区主义政党(SNRP)是欧洲的热心支持者。这种支持被解释为超国家一体化的积极发展,使这些行为体相信欧洲可以促进实现其领土要求。然而,其他的工作导致了一种预期,即在地理上远离欧洲权力中心(布鲁塞尔)的岛屿地区内动员的SNRP将采取更多的欧洲怀疑论立场。本文旨在测试这些竞争的假设SNRP在欧洲的定位。它这样做是通过研究在地中海的两个岛屿地区的SNRP的态度:科西嘉和撒丁岛。研究结果表明,这两个地方的SNRP不能被充分归类为亲欧或疑欧。本文探讨了几个特定的背景和演员的因素在塑造复杂的定位岛屿民族主义者在科西嘉和撒丁岛的欧洲问题上的作用。
Many scholars have identified stateless nationalist and regionalist parties (SNRPs) as ardent supporters of Europe. This support has been explained as a result of positive developments in supranational integration that convinced these actors that Europe could facilitate the achievement of their territorial demands. Other work, however, leads to an expectation that SNRPs that mobilise within island regions that are geographically distant from the European centre of power (Brussels) will adopt more Eurosceptic positions. This article aims to test these competing hypotheses about the positioning of SNRPs on Europe. It does so by examining the attitudes of SNRPs in two island regions in the Mediterranean: Corsica and Sardinia. The findings suggest that SNRPs in both places cannot be adequately categorised as either Europhile or Eurosceptic. The article examines the role of several context- and actor-specific factors in shaping the complex positioning of island nationalists in Corsica and Sardinia on the issue of Europe.
利用欧洲:多层次体系中的领土政党战略
DOI: 10.7765/9781847793089
发表时间: 2010
影响因子: 0.8
作者:
Eve Hepburn
通讯作者: Eve Hepburn
DOI: --
发表时间: 1998
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
J. Hache
通讯作者: J. Hache
法国的地区主义和民族主义:科西嘉岛的案例研究
DOI: --
发表时间: 1987
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
J. Loughlin
通讯作者: J. Loughlin
异议的试金石:当代西欧政党体系中的欧洲怀疑主义
DOI: --
发表时间: 1998
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
P. Taggart
通讯作者: P. Taggart
单独行动:在欧盟的直接区域代表
DOI: --
发表时间: 2008
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
M. Tatham
通讯作者: M. Tatham