College student involvement in cigarette smoking: The role of psychosocial and behavioral protection and risk

College student involvement in cigarette smoking: The role of psychosocial and behavioral protection and risk
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/14622200601078558
复制
发表时间:
2007-02-01
影响因子:
4.7
通讯作者:
Turbin, Mark S.
Turbin, Mark S.
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Costa, Frances M.;Jessor, Richard;Turbin, Mark S.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

一个基于理论的保护和风险模型被用来解释大学生吸烟的变化。主要目的是检查是否心理和行为的保护和风险因素可以解释吸烟的横截面和发展变化,并检查是否保护缓和吸烟参与的风险的影响。这项三波纵向研究的数据收集在2002年秋季,2003年春季和2004年春季从549名男性和427名女性第一学期的大学生在科罗拉多大学,博尔德。一份32页的问卷,内容理论上来自问题行为理论的结构。吸烟(过去一个月平均每天吸烟的数量),三种类型的心理社会保护(模型保护,控制保护,支持保护),三种类型的心理社会风险(模型风险,机会风险和脆弱性风险),两种类型的行为保护(教会参与,学术成就)和两种类型的行为风险(问题饮酒,大麻使用)进行了评估。心理社会和行为的保护和风险因素占吸烟参与的显着变化,和保护缓和风险的影响。在大多数情况下,对于两种性别和三个独立的数据波,结果是一致的。吸烟参与的关键预测因素包括控制保护,模型风险,脆弱性风险,行为保护和行为风险。先前的保护和危险因素与在大学环境中开始吸烟有关。一个模型的保护和风险因素可以在了解大学吸烟行为和建议干预目标是有用的。
A theory-based protection and risk model was applied to explain variation in college students' cigarette smoking. Key aims were to examine whether psychosocial and behavioral protective and risk factors can account for cross-sectional and developmental variation in smoking, and to examine whether protection moderates the impact of risk on smoking involvement. Data for this three-wave longitudinal study were collected in fall 2002, spring 2003, and spring 2004 from 549 male and 427 female first-semester college students at the University of Colorado, Boulder. A 32-page questionnaire was used, with content theoretically derived from the constructs in problem-behavior theory. Cigarette smoking (number of cigarettes smoked on an average day in the past month), three types of psychosocial protection (models protection, controls protection, support protection), three types of psychosocial risk (models risk, opportunity risk, and vulnerability risk), two types of behavioral protection (church involvement, academic achievement), and two types of behavioral risk (problem drinking, marijuana use) were assessed. Psychosocial and behavioral protective and risk factors accounted for significant variation in smoking involvement, and protection moderated the impact of risk. Findings were consistent, for the most part, for both genders and across three separate waves of data. Key predictors of smoking involvement included controls protection, models risk, vulnerability risk, behavioral protection, and behavioral risk. Antecedent protective and risk factors were associated with the initiation of smoking in the college setting. A model of protective and risk factors can be useful in understanding college smoking behavior and suggesting targets for intervention.