A performative paradigm for post-qualitative inquiry
A performative paradigm for post-qualitative inquiry
复制标题
后定性探究的表演范式
作者：
Tone Pernille Østern;Sofia Jusslin;Kristian Nødtvedt Knudsen;Pauliina Maapalo;Ingrid Bjørkøy
在这篇文章中，作者探索和贡献了一种行为研究范式，在这种范式中，后定性研究和艺术研究可能会居住和呼吸。从2006年哈斯曼的《表现性研究宣言》开始，进入了讨论的脉络，并在定性研究的边缘建立了他们自己的摩擦引导的研究过程，作者们加入了表演性、非代表性的理论和方法、后定性研究和后方法。提出了一种后定性研究的行为范式，其中知识被视为正在形成的知识，是研究者通过与研究现象和更广阔的世界的纠缠不断地创造差异。表演性范式为运动、(艺术)自由、(后定性)实验和包容创造了空间。表演性研究范式也提供了挑衅，动摇了关于研究是什么和应该是什么的长期观念。在表演性研究范式中，学习/成为/知晓总是成为--就像表演性范式本身一样。
In this article, the authors explore and contribute to producing a performative research paradigm where post-qualitative as well as artistic research might dwell and breathe. Entering a thread of discussion that started with Haseman’s A manifesto for performative research in 2006, and building on their own friction-led research processes at the edges of qualitative research, the authors plug in with performativity, non-representational theories and methodologies, post-qualitative inquiry and post approaches. A performative paradigm for post-qualitative inquiry is proposed, where knowledge is viewed as knowledge-in-becoming as the constant creation of difference through researcher entanglement with the research phenomenon and wider world. A performative paradigm produces a space for movement, (artistic) freedom, (post-qualitative) experimentation and inclusion. A performative research paradigm also offers provocations that shake long-established notions about what research is and should be. Within a performative research paradigm, learning/be(com)ing/knowing is always in-becoming – as is the performative paradigm itself.