Public preferences regarding the goals of farmland preservation programs: comment.
Public preferences regarding the goals of farmland preservation programs: comment.
复制标题
公众对农田保护计划目标的偏好：评论。
DOI：
10.2307/3146885
复制
发表时间：
1998
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. Rosenberger
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Rosenberger
Kline和Wichelns（1996）（以下简称KW）在该杂志最近的一篇文章中认为，如果将公共（政府）农田保护计划扩大到不仅包括农业生产和生活方式标准，而且还包括开放空间标准作为保护目标，那么该计划将更加有效。虽然公众可能更喜欢开放空间的好处比农业的好处，许多公共保护计划的授权立法降级开放空间的目标作为次要的农业的。因此，通过扩大这些公共项目的立法范围，将农业生产、生活方式、美学、环境和开放空间等多重目标包括在内，有针对性的保护土地将更有效率（和有效）地满足公众的多重目标。通常，非农业目标是由计划的支持者强调，以获得公众的支持。作为土地保护偏好排名的证据，KW收集了罗得岛居民的定性数据，
In a recent article in this journal, Kline and Wichelns (1996) (hereafter KW) argued that public (government) farmland preservation programs would be more efficient if broadened to include not only agricultural productive and lifestyle criteria, but also open space criteria as preservation objectives. While the public may prefer the open space benefits more than the agrarian benefits, much of the enabling legislation of public preservation programs relegate open space objectives as secondary to the agrarian ones. Therefore, by broadening the legislative scope of these public programs to include the multiple objectives of agricultural productive, lifestyle, aesthetics, environment, and open space, targeted land for preservation would be more efficient (and effective) in meeting the public's multiple objectives. Often, the nonagrarian objectives are highlighted by program proponents to gain public support. As evidence on the ranking of land preservation preferences, KW collected qualitative data from Rhode Island residents on reasons