Long‐term monthly climate data at the forest stations of Kyoto University
Long‐term monthly climate data at the forest stations of Kyoto University
复制标题
京都大学森林站的长期月度气候数据
DOI：
10.1111/1440-1703.12116
复制
发表时间：
2020
影响因子：
2
通讯作者：
Ishihara Masae I.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Nakagawa Hikaru;Hasegawa Atsushi;Hayashi Daisuke;Furuta Makoto;Kishimoto Yasunori;Miyagi Yuta;Ohashi Kenta;Okabe Yoshihiko;Yamauchi Takayuki;Ishihara Masae I.
大学的长期气候监测为自然科学各学科提供基础数据。京都大学曾经管理过10个大学森林站，目前管理着5个。除了国外的站外，这些站几乎从建站至今一直在监测气候数据。我们汇总并报告了这些森林站从监测开始到 2018 年 12 月的每月气候数据。这些数据对于调查东亚（包括中国（台湾）、韩国（朝鲜）和俄罗斯（库页岛、卡拉太）过去 100 年的环境变化非常重要。长期监测往往会因技术进步、标准方法的变化以及气候和人为灾害等不可避免的情况而导致监测程序、设备甚至监测地点发生或大或小的变化。因此，监测方法的相关元数据也很重要。我们还编制了有关监测方法变化的元数据。此外，为了检验方法变化对观测气候数据的影响，我们比较了每个监测点每个气候变量的变化前后记录的值。方法的变化仅影响少数变量，湿度除外。当研究人员在任何分析中使用湿度数据时，可能需要仔细解释。发表在期刊数据论文部分的本摘要的完整数据集可在 JaLTER 中的 MetaCat 中以电子格式获取，网址为 http://db.cger.nies.go.jp/JaLTER/metacat/metacat/ERDP-2020-03.1/jalter-en。
Long‐term climate monitoring by universities provides fundamental data for various disciplines in the natural sciences. Kyoto University once managed 10 university forest stations and is currently managing five. At these stations, climate data have been monitored almost since the establishment of each station until today, with the exception of the stations in foreign countries. We compiled and report the monthly climate data at these forest stations from the start of monitoring until December 2018. These data are important for investigating environmental changes in East Asia, including China (Taiwan), South Korea (Chosen) and Russia (Sakhalin, Karafuto) over the last 100 years. Long‐term monitoring often involves minor and major changes in the monitoring procedures, devices and even monitoring sites due to unavoidable circumstances, such as technological advances, changes in standard methods and climatic and anthropogenic disasters. Therefore, associated metadata on the monitoring methods are also important. We also compiled metadata on changes in monitoring methods. In addition, to examine the effects of changes in the methods on the observed climate data, we compared the values recorded before and after the change for each climate variable at each monitoring site. Methodological changes affected only a few variables, with the exception of humidity. Careful interpretation may be required when a researcher uses humidity data in any analysis.The complete data set for this abstract published in the Data Paper section of the journal is available in electronic format in MetaCat in JaLTER at http://db.cger.nies.go.jp/JaLTER/metacat/metacat/ERDP-2020-03.1/jalter-en.