Guiding use case authoring: results of an empirical study
Guiding use case authoring: results of an empirical study
复制标题
指导用例创作：实证研究的结果
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1999
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
N. Maiden
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Salinesi;C. Rolland;C. Souveyet;N. Maiden
本文给出了两项实证研究的第一项结果，这两项研究检查了用例创作指南的有效性。ESPRIT 21.903 CREWS长期研究项目已经为创作需求获取和验证用例开发了风格和内容指南。在不同条件下对这些指导方针的有效性进行了评估。结果表明：创作指南提高了用例散文的整体质量；不同的指导方针工作方式不同，效率也不同；用例从来不会完全正确地编写；因此，它们可以被系统地纠正。本文详细介绍了有指导和无指导的用例创作之间的定性和定量比较。它概述了对CREWS软件工具设计的经验教训和影响。
This paper presents results from the first of two empirical studies which examine the effectiveness of guidelines for use case authoring. The ESPRIT 21.903 CREWS long-term research project has developed style and content guidelines for authoring use cases for requirements acquisition and validation. The effectiveness of these guidelines has been evaluated under different conditions. Results indicate that: the authoring guidelines improve the overall quality of the use case prose; the different guidelines work differently and with different levels of efficiency; and use cases are never entirely correctly written; thus, they can be systematically corrected. The paper details a qualitative and quantitative comparison between guided and non-guided use case authoring. It outlines lessons learned and implications for the CREWS software tools design.