Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective
Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective
复制标题
科学表征：视角的悖论
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2009
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Massimi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Massimi
这本书对古代认识论提供了一种原创性的、但又植根于历史的解释。这种论证有时是有争议的。例如，格森认为亚里士多德和柏拉图认识论之间的相似性比大多数人都要大得多。他还将柏拉图解释为坚持普洛特的认知同一性理论。值得称赞的是，格森承认他的一些主张具有争议性(166)，并向读者指出了各种来源以供进一步阅读。虽然这本书的密度有时使自己变得晦涩难懂，但在最终的分析中，它提供了一个有价值的、得到很好辩护的古代认识论视角。
This book offers an original, yet historically rooted, interpretation of ancient epistemology. The argumentation is controversial at times. For example, Gerson thinks the similarities between Aristotelian and Platonic epistemology are far greater than most would. He also interprets Plato as adhering to a Plotinian cognitive identity thesis. Gerson, to his credit, acknowledges the controversial nature of some of his claims (166), and points the reader to a variety of sources for further reading. Although the density of this book lends itself to obscurity at times, in the fi nal analysis it provides a valuable and well defended perspective of ancient epistemology.