The calculus of consent after thirty years
The calculus of consent after thirty years
复制标题
三十年后同意的计算
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1994
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
H. Kliemt
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
H. Kliemt
结果表明，微积分的基本规范论证是集体主义的一致规范。由于在公共选择领域工作的大多数学者，包括半微积分的作者，都会反对集体主义的规范性前提，重新解释微积分的一致原则的地位似乎是不可避免的。这篇论文认为，如果一个社会的基本形成不是从一组给定的个人开始，而是从俱乐部的形成开始，就可以做到这一点。这等同于用更符合标准经济学方法论的特殊主义伦理前提取代普遍主义的伦理前提。
It is shown that the basic normative argument of thecalculus is moored to a collectivistic unanimity norm. As most scholars working in the field of public choice, including the authors of the seminalcalculus, would otherwise reject collectivistic normative premises, a re-interpretation of the status of the unanimity principle of thecalculus seems unavoidable. The paper argues that this can be done if the basic formation of a society is not characterized as starting from a given set of individuals but rather in terms of the formation of clubs. This amounts to the same thing as substituting universalistic ethical premises by particularistic ones which are more in line with standard economic methodology.