Spectral Transform Decision Diagrams

Spectral Transform Decision Diagrams
复制标题

谱变换决策图

DOI:
10.1007/978-1-4613-1385-4_3
复制
发表时间:
1996
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
C. Moraga
C. Moraga
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
R. Stankovic;Tsutomu Sasao;C. Moraga

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本章提出了谱决策图(STDD),它是开关函数和整数值函数的谱变换的图形表示。二元决策图(Binary Decision Diagram,BDD)和功能决策图(Functional Decision Diagram,FDD)分别是开关函数及其Reed-Muller变换的图形表示。多端判决图(MTBDD)、算术变换判决图(ACDD)和沃尔什变换判决图(WDD)分别是整数值函数、其算术变换和其沃尔什变换的图形表示。本章说明STDD同时表示函数及其谱变换。对于n位加法器,ACDD和WDD需要O(n)个节点,而MTBDD需要O(2n)个节点。对于n位乘法器,ACDD和WDD需要O(n2)个节点,MTBDD需要O(4 n)个节点。
This chapter proposes spectral decision diagrams (STDDs), that are graphical representations of spectral transforms of switching functions and integer-valued functions. Binary decision diagrams (BDDs) and functional decision diagrams (FDDs) are graphical representations for switching functions and their Reed-Muller transforms, respectively. Multi-terminal decision diagrams (MTBDDs), arithmetic transform decision diagrams (ACDDs), and Walsh transform decision diagrams (WDDs) are graphical representations for integer-valued functions, their arithmetic transforms, and their Walsh transforms, respectively. This chapter shows that an STDD represents a function and its spectral transform at the same time. As forn-bit adders, ACDDs and WDDs requireO(n) nodes while MTBDDs requireO(2n) nodes. As forn-bit multipliers, ACDDs and WDDs requireO(n2) nodes while MTBDDs requireO(4n) nodes.