Why new guidelines for reporting improvement research? And why now?
Why new guidelines for reporting improvement research? And why now?
复制标题
为什么要制定报告改进研究的新指南？
DOI：
10.1136/qshc.2005.016311
复制
发表时间：
2005
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
D. Stevens
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Stevens
读者、作者和评审者有机会就新指南草案发表意见
问为什么QSHC会为报告改进研究制定额外的指南是合理的--为什么是现在？1关于质量改进报告(QIR)的有用和有价值的指南最初发表在我们的前身期刊《卫生保健质量》2上，并于2004年在QSHC上重印。BMJ在2001.3份QIR中也采用了这种格式，最初出现的速度很慢，但最近在QSHC中发布的频率越来越高，特别是在QIR指南重印之后。
在本期QSHC Davidoff和Batalden的论文中，Davidoff和Batalden强调，拟议的新指南并不是要取代QIR。1实际上，它们最好被视为改进学术连续体的一部分，范围从个别案例报告和QIR到解决复杂系统和安全问题的研究。…
An opportunity for readers, authors, and reviewers to voice their opinions on the draft new guidelines
It is reasonable to ask why QSHC would embark on additional guidelines for reporting improvement research—and why now?1 Useful and valuable guidelines for quality improvement reports (QIRs) were initially published in our predecessor journal, Quality in Health Care , in 1999,2 and reprinted again in QSHC in 2004. The BMJ also adopted this format in 2001.3 QIRs were initially slow to appear, but they have been published recently with increasing regularity in QSHC , particularly since the QIR guidelines were reprinted.
In their paper in this issue of QSHC Davidoff and Batalden emphasize that the proposed new guidelines are not intended to supersede QIRs.1 Indeed, they are best seen as part of the continuum of improvement scholarship that ranges from individual case reports and QIRs to studies that address complex systems and safety issues. …