A guide to the archives and manuscripts of The Royal Society
A guide to the archives and manuscripts of The Royal Society
复制标题
英国皇家学会档案和手稿指南
DOI:
10.1017/s0025727300062153
复制
发表时间:
1997
期刊:
影响因子:
1.4
通讯作者:
Richard Palmer
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Richard Palmer
thinkers, the "science of man" meant exactly that and did not include women; and that "nature" provided the foundation of difference, not its erasure. Additional exploration of the meaning of "science" is provided by Phillip Sloan in his magisterial essay on the natural history of man. He concentrates on Linnaeus and Buffon, practising scientists with very different views of what constituted human science. The ultimate synthesis of Linnaean classification with Buffon's historical view of development underlay much nineteenth-century discourse on humans as animals. Roy Porter's essay on 'Medical science and human science' underlines the uncertain relationship between these two topics. While medicine became more scientific-in theory if not in practice-over the course of the eighteenth century, the role of medicine in the larger Enlightenment project remained ambiguous. Despite Peter Gay's assertion that medicine was central to the Enlightenment "recovery of nerve", Porter sees not a causal arrow but a complex interplay of ideas among which medicine was one of many. Gloria Flaherty's account of the so-called "non-normal sciences" such as mesmerism, Franz Joseph Gall's "organology" and Johann Caspar Lavater's notions of physiognomy serves to undermine yet more the claims to science of eighteenth-century medicine. Essays on society, politics, and political economy further extend the range of human science. This volume provides a good introduction to some of the central questions of Enlightenment thought. A collection of essays, when it is as well-organized as this one, can be worth far more than the sum of its parts. Writing a guide to the contents of a record repository is no mean task. I can vouch for this, since at Lambeth Palace Library the preparation of our guide was in progress as long ago as 1962; it has yet to appear. Readers' enquiries, acquisitions, the listing of new collections and a thousand other tasks intrude, with more pressing deadlines. Then there are voices in the profession which question whether it is worthwhile to publish a guide at all, when new acquisitions soon render it incomplete. Is it necessary when the on-line searching of databases increasingly offers more immediate access to information? The answer from the researcher's point of view is certainly yes. Every scholar who enters a record office for the first time needs the essential orientation, the first steps in formulating a search strategy, which the guide provides. All the more credit goes to the authors of the two guides reviewed here. …