Ballistic and quantum conductor carbon nanotubes: a reference experiment put to the test

Ballistic and quantum conductor carbon nanotubes: a reference experiment put to the test
复制标题

弹道和量子导体碳纳米管:用于测试的参考实验

DOI:
10.1103/physrevb.90.195431
复制
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
C. Colliex,
C. Colliex,
中科院分区:
物理与天体物理2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Kobylko;M. Kociak;Y. Sato;Koki Urita;A. M. Bonnot;A. Kasumov;Y. Kasumov;K. Suenaga;C. Colliex,

文献摘要

相似文献

我们已经进行了电传输实验上的个别碳纳米管(CNT)在原位的透射电子显微镜使用液体-金属接触法(LMC方法),其中包括浸入放置在顶端的金属尖端到一滴液体汞(Hg)的CNT。在文献中,这种方法大多采用非可视化(非原位),以显示不同种类的碳纳米管的弹道和量子电导特性。我们表明,一方面thein situLMC方法非常适合于与CNT建立低电阻接触,但另一方面,由theex situLMC方法测量的弹道和量子电导可能会给出误报,原因有三:(a)CNT可能通过与Hg接触而从尖端表面去除,(B)出现的Hg尖端表面纳米接触可能被误认为是量子导体CNT,以及(c)出现的Hg纳米现象可能被误认为是弹道导体CNT。这些发现对解释以前报道的作品有很强的影响。
We have performed electrical transport experiments on individual carbon nanotubes (CNTs)in situin a transmission electron microscope using the liquid-metal contact method (LMC method), which consists of immersing a CNT placed on the apex of a metallic tip into a drop of liquid mercury (Hg). In the literature, this method has been mostly employed without visualization (ex situ) to show the ballistic- and quantum-conductance properties of different kinds of CNTs. We show that on the one hand thein situLMC method is well suited to create low-resistance contacts with the CNTs but on the other hand the ballistic and quantum conductance measured by theex situLMC method is likely to give false positives for three reasons: (a) the CNTs are likely to be removed from the tip surface through contact with the Hg, (b) occurring Hg-tip surface nanocontacts are likely to be mistaken for quantum-conductor CNTs, and (c) occurring Hg nanomenisci are likely to be mistaken for ballistic-conductor CNTs. These findings have strong consequences for the interpretation of previously reported works.