Taking proportionality seriously: The use of contextual integrity for a more informed and transparent analysis in EU data protection law
Taking proportionality seriously: The use of contextual integrity for a more informed and transparent analysis in EU data protection law
复制标题
认真对待相称性：利用上下文完整性在欧盟数据保护法中进行更明智和透明的分析
DOI：
10.1111/eulj.12273
复制
发表时间：
2018
影响因子：
1.9
通讯作者：
Guinchard A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Guinchard A
在个人数据的合法处理和非法处理之间的界限应如何划定方面存在着很多困难。欧盟数据保护指令（DPD）95/46的开放式措辞为不同的解释留下了空间。欧洲法院认为，很难系统地确定与个人权利及其处理相关的背景数据流，从而对相称性分析产生连带影响，从而呼应了关于相称性的更广泛辩论。考虑到欧洲法院的决定和一般数据保护条例引入的变化的批评，本文提出使用上下文完整性，分析框架开发的海伦Nissenbaum，主要是隐含在欧盟数据保护法，提供一个系统的解释方法，确保在当前欧盟法律的实践更加一致。它建议采用一种新的正式的三层结构，以便充分和系统地确定讨论相称性所需的所有因素，并认真对待相称性。
Difficulties abound as to where the boundary between legitimate and illegitimate processing of personal data should be set. The open‐ended wording of the EU Data Protection Directive (DPD) 95/46 leaves space for diverse interpretations. The European Court of Justice finds it difficult to establish methodically the contextual data flows associated with individuals’ rights and their processing, with cascading consequences for the proportionality analysis, thus echoing the wider debate on proportionality. Taking stock of the criticisms of the ECJ's decisions and of the changes introduced by the General Data Protection Regulation, this paper proposes to use contextual integrity, a framework of analysis developed by Helen Nissenbaum, largely implicit in EU data protection law, to provide a systematic method of interpretation that ensures more consistency in current EU legal practice. It recommends adopting a new formal three‐tier structure, so that all factors necessary to the discussion on proportionality are fully and systematically identified and proportionality is taken seriously.